Abstract

PurposeTo examine the extent to which commonly ordered laboratory values obtained from large health care databases are representative of the distribution of laboratory values from the general population as reflected in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MethodsMeans of test values from commercial insurance laboratory data and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data were compared. Inverse probability of selection weighting was used to account for possible selection bias and to create comparability between the two data sources. ResultsThe average values of most of the laboratory results from routine care were very close to their population means as estimated from NHANES. Tests that were more selectively ordered tended to differ. The inverse probability of selection weighting approach generally had a small effect on the estimated means but did improve estimation of some of the more selected tests. ConclusionsCommonly ordered laboratory tests appear to be representative of values from the underlying population. This suggests that trends and other patterns in biomarker levels in the population may be reasonably studied using data collected during the routine delivery of medical care.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.