Abstract
This paper investigates methods to estimate the upper tail of the wealth distribution. I compare data types and estimation methods using data from the Netherlands for the period 1993–2018, exploiting the unique availability of multiple types of data for this context. In addition to comparing the existing methods of OLS regression, Maximum Likelihood, and Generalized Pareto interpolation, I develop a new method to combine data from several sources. This method, called Robust Pareto Regression, combines local estimates of wealth concentration from individual data sources, and uses fixed effects methods to correct for the heterogeneity across data sources and years. Several conclusions emerge: (i) No data source on its own accurately captures the top tail, meaning that all sources need to be adjusted or combined to estimate top wealth. (ii) Combining surveys with rich lists is highly sensitive to the quality of the underlying data sources; generalized Pareto interpolation partly addresses this concern, but straight Pareto regression and Maximum Likelihood methods do not. (iii) Robust Pareto Regression is preferable to existing methods, since it more adequately adjusts for data heterogeneity, and easily shows trends over time.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.