Estimating Summer Low-Flow in Streams in a Morainal Landscape using Spatial Hydrologic Models

Abstract

This study evaluated the capability of four spatial hydrologic models to estimate summer low-flow stream discharge, as a surrogate for baseflow, and assessed the influence of land cover/land use on these flows, in small streams across the Oak Ridges Moraine. Low-flow discharge varied predictably with area of the upstream catchment, but also with reach slope and a measure of land cover disturbance (LDI). Low-flow volumes were lowest in streams with moderate agricultural and/or urban development (LDI of eight to 12%), and high over a range of development intensities. Each of Baseflow Index (BFI×Area), Darcy Index (DI), MODFLOW (MF) and a finer resolution MODFLOW model (FMF) were about equal in their capability to estimate low-flow discharge, with MF and FMF having a somewhat stronger relationship and Darcy Index having a somewhat poorer relationship, particularly in smaller catchments. Each of the models generally predicted low-flow discharge volumes to within about 400 L/s of the actual observed low-flow discharge. The models, therefore, were generally unable to predict whether a stream was flowing during periods of low-flow when the upstream catchment was smaller than about 17,800 ha. It was found that these methods cannot be reliably applied in small catchments as there is too much natural variability in flow conditions. This paper suggests that these methods do not reflect local conditions, but rather provide generalized information about water flows. As a result, it is recommended that until spatial model predictions are improved for local applications, water managers should invest in field surveys to confirm flow conditions in small catchments.