Abstract

Nutrient pollution remains one of the leading causes of river degradation, making it important to set thresholds that support good ecological condition, which is the main objective of managing Europe's aquatic environment. A wide range of methods has been used by European member states to set river nutrient thresholds in the past, and these vary greatly among countries, even for similar river types. In some countries, thresholds have been set using expert judgement or the statistical distribution of nutrient concentrations. Application of such thresholds creates problems for planning strategies to achieve good ecological status and for managing transboundary river basins. An alternative approach is to examine the statistical relationship between nutrient concentration and one, or more, biological variables. Such relationships can then be used to inform decisions by water managers. We use such 'ecology-based' approaches (univariate regression and mismatch analyses) to derive nutrient thresholds for several river types in Central Europe. Our analysis focused on soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) and total nitrogen (TN), two variables which were responsible for significant variation (40–55%) in river benthic floras. In this study, for the first time, river nutrient thresholds are estimated using both macrophytes and phytobenthos (EQRs) separately and in combination, calculated as the minimum and the average of the EQRs of the two sub-elements. The resulting thresholds supporting good ecological status range from 21 to 42 µg/L SRP and 0.9–3.5 mg/L TN for the low alkalinity lowland river type, and 32–90 µg/L SRP and 1.0–2.5 mg/L TN for the low alkalinity mid-altitude river type. These targets are compared to the values set by member states. We demonstrate that some national nutrient thresholds fall within the range of predicted values if uncertainty is taken into consideration; however, several threshold values considerably exceed this range. Adopting ecology-based nutrient targets should improve sustainable river management where nutrients are the major pressure preventing the achievement of good ecological status.

Highlights

  • Rivers are critical for providing provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services, they are facing unprece­ dented threats from urbanization, agriculture and climate change (MEA, 2005; Vorosmarty et al, 2010; Reid et al, 2019) and are heavily degraded throughout Europe

  • Our analysis focused on soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) and total ni­ trogen (TN), two variables which were responsible for significant variation (40–55%) in river benthic floras

  • For low alkalinity lowland rivers (R-C1), the relationship between SRP and Macrophyte Ecological Quality Ratios (EQR) predicted a concentration for the goodmoderate boundary of 37 μg/L, with 50% of the data having values between 21 and 66 μg/L (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rivers are critical for providing provisioning (water and food), regulating (water purification, climate resilience) and cultural (recreation and tourism) ecosystem services, they are facing unprece­ dented threats from urbanization, agriculture and climate change (MEA, 2005; Vorosmarty et al, 2010; Reid et al, 2019) and are heavily degraded throughout Europe. A recent analysis has shown that less than half (42%) of river stretches in Europe are in high and good ecological status, with the remainder divided between moderate (36%), poor and bad (17%) or unknown (5%) (EEA, 2018). Several pressures affect Eu­ ropean rivers, often simultaneously: hydrological and morphological alteration, chemical contamination, microplastics, overexploitation and alien species

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call