Abstract

BackgroundProbabilistic record linkage is a process used to bring together person-based records from within the same dataset (de-duplication) or from disparate datasets using pairwise comparisons and matching probabilities. The linkage strategy and associated match probabilities are often estimated through investigations into data quality and manual inspection. However, as privacy-preserved datasets comprise encrypted data, such methods are not possible. In this paper, we present a method for estimating the probabilities and threshold values for probabilistic privacy-preserved record linkage using Bloom filters.MethodsOur method was tested through a simulation study using synthetic data, followed by an application using real-world administrative data. Synthetic datasets were generated with error rates from zero to 20% error. Our method was used to estimate parameters (probabilities and thresholds) for de-duplication linkages. Linkage quality was determined by F-measure. Each dataset was privacy-preserved using separate Bloom filters for each field. Match probabilities were estimated using the expectation-maximisation (EM) algorithm on the privacy-preserved data. Threshold cut-off values were determined by an extension to the EM algorithm allowing linkage quality to be estimated for each possible threshold. De-duplication linkages of each privacy-preserved dataset were performed using both estimated and calculated probabilities. Linkage quality using the F-measure at the estimated threshold values was also compared to the highest F-measure. Three large administrative datasets were used to demonstrate the applicability of the probability and threshold estimation technique on real-world data.ResultsLinkage of the synthetic datasets using the estimated probabilities produced an F-measure that was comparable to the F-measure using calculated probabilities, even with up to 20% error. Linkage of the administrative datasets using estimated probabilities produced an F-measure that was higher than the F-measure using calculated probabilities. Further, the threshold estimation yielded results for F-measure that were only slightly below the highest possible for those probabilities.ConclusionsThe method appears highly accurate across a spectrum of datasets with varying degrees of error. As there are few alternatives for parameter estimation, the approach is a major step towards providing a complete operational approach for probabilistic linkage of privacy-preserved datasets.

Highlights

  • Probabilistic record linkage is a process used to bring together person-based records from within the same dataset or from disparate datasets using pairwise comparisons and matching probabilities

  • We present a method for accurately estimating probabilities and an optimal threshold cutoff value that can be applied when using Bloom filters within the Fellegi-Sunter model for record linkage

  • These results show that the use of EM for probability estimation, combined with our threshold estimation technique, provided linkage quality comparable to the best achievable using calculated probabilities, on data with up to 20% error

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Probabilistic record linkage is a process used to bring together person-based records from within the same dataset (de-duplication) or from disparate datasets using pairwise comparisons and matching probabilities. Privacy-preserving record linkage Legal, administrative and technical issues can prevent the release of name-identified data for record linkage. Brown et al BMC Medical Research Methodology (2017) 17:95 release of personally identifying information by data custodians; rather, data custodians use specific encoding processes to transform personally identifying information into a permanently non-identifiable state (an irreversible ‘privacy-preserved’ state). These methods are collectively referred to as privacypreserving record linkage (PPRL). Personally identifying information is not disclosed by the data custodian These PPRL methods can be used within existing record linkage frameworks, and are subject to some of the same challenges [2]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.