Abstract
AbstractExisting reduced-form default intensity models that jointly estimate probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) from credit default swaps (CDSs) produce dissimilar results, and there is little guidance on which time series specification to choose. This article develops a model of CDS term structure without parametric time series restrictions for PD and uses weak-identification robust methods to investigate whether separate identification of PD and LGD is still possible. Consistent with intuition about the identification strategy, the model is not globally identified. However, in my empirical application, LGD is precisely estimated for half of the firm-months under study, with resulting values much lower than conventional values. This implies that the risk-neutral PD and the risk premia on PD are underestimated when LGD is set to conventional values.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.