Abstract

Aerodynamic drag force and projected frontal area (A) are commonly used indicators of aerodynamic cycling efficiency. This study investigated the accuracy of estimating these quantities using easy-to-acquire anthropometric and pose measures. In the first part, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) drag force calculations and A (m2) values from photogrammetry methods were compared using predicted 3D cycling models for 10 male amateur cyclists. The shape of the 3D models was predicted using anthropometric measures. Subsequently, the models were reposed from a standing to a cycling pose using joint angle data from an optical motion capture (mocap) system. In the second part, a linear regression analysis was performed to predict A using 26 anthropometric measures combined with joint angle data from two sources (optical and inertial mocap, separately). Drag calculations were strongly correlated with benchmark projected frontal area (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.72). A can accurately be predicted using anthropometric data and joint angles from optical mocap (root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.037 m2) or inertial mocap (RMSE = 0.032 m2). This study showed that aerodynamic efficiency can be predicted using anthropometric and joint angle data from commercially available, inexpensive posture tracking methods. The practical relevance for cyclists is to quantify and train posture during cycling for improving aerodynamic efficiency and hence performance.

Highlights

  • In road cycling, aerodynamic drag force contributes to 70–90% of the resistance to the cyclist on level ground [1]

  • This study investigated low-cost methods to estimate these two quantities using easy to acquire anthropometric measures, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses, a smartphone camera in combination with open-source optical mocap, and inertial mocap from commercially available plug-and-play wearable sensors

  • Drag calculations were strongly correlated with benchmark projected frontal area measurements (R2 = 0.72)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aerodynamic drag force (or ‘drag’) contributes to 70–90% of the resistance to the cyclist on level ground [1]. Improving cycling performance is a priority for elite and amateur cyclists. A wind tunnel is the gold standard for measuring aerodynamic force, drag area, and studying air flow behavior. A wind tunnel is not accessible or affordable even for elite athletes. Several alternative methods for measuring aerodynamic performance in athletes in controlled environments are described in the literature including photogrammetry [2]; power meters [3]; and air pressure and speed sensors [4,5]. The approach of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call