Abstract
Simple SummaryTransformation of forest into farmland and many other drivers of global change have the potential for quickly reducing or altering the set of mammal species inhabiting a particular place. To document this process, lists of species updated at regular intervals should be compared. Several detection techniques are available to make lists of medium to large mammal species during field surveys. We explore whether four field methods differ in their efficiency to describe a complete list of species and in their capacity to produce the same list, provided that species composition has not changed. Using track surveys, we detected all species present in a region encompassing three Mediterranean landscapes and obtained the most accurate description of the number of species in 24 specific localities within the region. The sampling effort needed for track surveys was also relatively low. Had we chosen camera traps, scent stations, or scat surveys as the only survey method during the same period, we would have obtained incomplete species lists. We show that the common practice of using a single detection method without previous evaluation may produce unreliable species inventories, hampering a correct assessment of the impact of human activity on wild mammals.Detecting rapid changes in mammal composition at large spatial scales requires efficient detection methods. Many studies estimate species composition with a single survey method without asking whether that particular method optimises detection for all occurring species and yields reliable community-level indices. We explore the implications of between-method differences in efficiency, consistency, and sampling effort for the basic characterisation of assemblages of medium to large mammals in a region with three contrasted Mediterranean landscapes. We assessed differences between camera traps, scent stations, scat surveys, and track surveys. Using track surveys, we detected all species present in the regional pool (13) and obtained the most accurate description of local species richness and composition with the lowest sampling effort (16 sampling units and 2 survey sessions at most). Had we chosen camera traps, scent stations, or scat surveys as the only survey method, we would have underestimated species richness (9, 11, and 12 species, respectively) and misrepresented species composition in varying degrees. Preliminary studies of method performance inform whether single or multiple survey methods are needed and eventually which single method might be most appropriate. Without such a formal assessment current practices may produce unreliable and incomplete species inventories, ultimately leading to incorrect conclusions about the impact of human activity on mammal communities.
Highlights
The scale at which human activity impacts on biodiversity, manifested through processes such as quick colonisation and transformation of remote areas, atmospheric warming, or the spread of invasive species, is quickly shifting from local to regional or global [1,2]. 4.0/).The impacts of human activity produce changes in the composition of mammal assemblages over large regions, for example through the extinction of sensitive species or the invasion of exotic species, unbalancing ecological interactions, homogenising species composition, or prompting the loss of ecosystem services [3,4]
We explore the implications of between-method differences in efficiency and consistency for the characterisation of mammal communities, and provide a novel framework for evaluating method performance, optimising the estimation of simple community-level indices for rapid regional mammal inventories
Each detection method yielded a different estimate of species composition of the mammal assemblage as well as different estimates of species richness (Table S1)
Summary
The scale at which human activity impacts on biodiversity, manifested through processes such as quick colonisation and transformation of remote areas, atmospheric warming, or the spread of invasive species, is quickly shifting from local to regional or global [1,2]. The impacts of human activity produce changes in the composition of mammal assemblages over large regions, for example through the extinction of sensitive species or the invasion of exotic species, unbalancing ecological interactions, homogenising species composition, or prompting the loss of ecosystem services [3,4]. As the extent and intensity of human activity increase at an exponential rate, regional changes in the composition of mammal assemblages are expected to accelerate. Detecting rapid changes in mammal composition requires frequent monitoring [10], considerable replication [11], and efficient detection methods capable of providing reliable estimates during short operation periods [12]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
