Abstract

Dual-beam airborne Doppler radars are commonly used in convection experiments for their ability to describe the dynamical structure of weather systems. However, instrumental limitations impose the use of wavelengths such as X-band, which are largely attenuated through heavy rain. This paper is the second of a series of two, which aim at developing schemes for attenuation correction. The authors’ final objective is to improve the estimation of precipitation sampled from airborne radars. The first paper was dealing with the application of “differential algorithms” (“stereoradar” and “quad beam”) to the independent retrieval of the specific attenuation and nonattenuated reflectivity, which shed some light on the physics of the precipitation. This second paper develops a more extensive procedure based upon the hybridization of a “differential” and an “integral” algorithm. It is much more flexible than the methods proposed in part one and allows full rainfall-rate retrievals in single aircraft experiments. This procedure is applied to the 9 February mesoscale convective system (MCS) study case from Tropical Ocean and Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment (TOGA COARE), and the impact of the reflectivity correction on the water budget at the cloud system scale is discussed. As expected, the production of water in the 9 February squall line is maximum below the freezing level and is located in the updraft resulting from the interaction between the warm inflow and rear-to-front cold flow. The authors’ analysis shows that the precipitation efficiency in the convective region of the system is 31%. Therefore, the large majority of water vapor condensed into cloud droplets and ice crystals does not immediately reach the surface as precipitation. It travels toward the rear of the system at the speed of the horizontal air motion, which suggests a large contribution of the stratiform area in the global water budget. The same calculation performed using raw attenuated data (without correcting scheme) gives an efficiency of only 19%. That result points out the importance of the correction for attenuation when measured reflectivities are used in rain-rate retrievals and water budgets.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.