Abstract
The relationship between the two parts of the Third Critique can now be reposed. The Critique of Aesthetic Judgment’s culmination in the symbolic hypotyposis of morality raised a significant connection between the aesthetic of reflective judgment and the typic of practical reason. The Critique of Teleological Judgment can now be seen to have reopened the question of reason’s self-generation in relation to the possibility of cognition of nature. But for the logic of reflective judgment to be articulated in relation to its aesthetic requires the thought of concrete life. Kant’s term for this is: culture.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
