Abstract
In response to a lack of data supporting (or otherwise) legally mandated escape gaps in an Australian recreational trap fishery for eastern rock lobster, Sagmariasus verreauxi, the effects of all prescribed options on catches were investigated. Round traps without escape gaps (control) were compared against those with either one (57×500mm), two (both 57×250mm) or three (all 57×200mm) rectangular openings (i.e. all similar areas) evenly located around the base of the trap perimeter. All traps with escape gaps retained significantly fewer undersized (by 54–84%) but more legal-sized (by 1.6–2.8 times) S. verreauxi than the control. Irrespective of escape gaps, there was also a positive association between antennae loss by S. verreauxi and trap soak time, although only one undersized individual died (for a total associated discard mortality <2%). These observations are explained by possible density-dependant behavioural responses of trapped S. verreauxi, with legal-sized individuals replacing escaping juveniles and increased physical interactions among all catches the longer they remained in traps. Escape gaps could be promoted in the fishery, not only for their utility in reducing catches of undersized individuals, but via the potential for almost triple the fishing power for targeted catches.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
