Abstract

The accuracy of the split- <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">CV</i> mobility extraction method is analyzed in buried-channel InGaAs MOSFETs with a Al <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> O <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sub> gate dielectric and an InP barrier, through a “simulated experiment” procedure using 2-D numerical device simulations that are preliminarily calibrated against experimental <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">I</i> - <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">V</i> and <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">CV</i> curves. The different error sources limiting the method accuracy are pointed out. It is suggested that, as a result of these errors, the split- <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">CV</i> method can appreciably underestimate the actual channel mobility in these devices, with an error of >;20% and >;50% on peak mobility and high- <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">V</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GS</sub> mobility, respectively. The method should therefore not be adopted for accurate mobility measurement in this operating regime but only as a fast response technique providing a conservative estimation of channel mobility. Moreover, the method provides mobility values that rapidly drop below the peak value for decreasing <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">V</i> <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">GS</sub> . It is shown that this behavior can be an artifact of the extraction method, which may mask physical mechanisms causing a real mobility drop with decreasing channel carrier density, such as Coulomb scattering mechanisms. This poses limitations to the adoption of split- <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">CV</i> mobility as a reference for mobility model assessment in this operating regime. The proposed methodology can be applied to other III-V FETs, including both heterostructure-based and inversion-mode devices.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call