Abstract
Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners are advanced practicing pharmacists in North Carolina that provide disease-specific management. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the efficacy and charges from referrals to a Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner by the primary care provider, to those managed by a primary care provider alone. Patients were separated into cohorts depending if they had at least two appointments with a Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner from November 2008 to November 2011. A primary care provider saw all patients at least twice during the study period. Cohorts were then matched by age, gender, and disease states. Medicare billed data was evaluated from outpatient visits related to hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy, as well as emergency department visits and inpatient admissions. Cost of medications was estimated using 2009 AWP data corresponding to medication histories within the electronic medical record. Efficacy was defined as ability to reach disease state goal determined using national guidelines and reduction in pain score. Efficacy was analyzed by difference-in-differences test and all other numerical data tested by paired t-tests. The Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners cohort experienced more outpatient visits (1338 vs. 858, p 0.05) than the primary care providers cohort, respectively. The Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners cohort showed changes in charges of +22.6 % for outpatient visits, −45.5 % emergency department visits, and −13.2 % inpatient admissions relative to the primary care provider cohort. There was no difference in average daily medication cost (Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners $38.52 vs. primary care providers $38.23, p = 0.97) or achievement of disease state goals. APPLE-NC demonstrated that through referrals, Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners provide services comparable in charges and efficacy to primary care providers. Consequently, the current increased need for primary care practitioners can be met in part by increasing the utilization of advanced practice pharmacists for chronic disease management. This does not apply for this retrospective cohort study.
Highlights
Erratum Following the publication of this article [1] it was brought to our attention that there was an error in the ‘Total cost’ paragraph of the ‘Results’ section
The paragraph currently reads: “The total cost of OPV, EDV, IA, and prescribed medications in the CPP-R cohort was 1.46% lower, as compared to the PCP-A cohort (p = 0.026) (Data not shown due to proprietary nature of data).”
* Correspondence: MicheleKislan@yvmh.org 1Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital, Yakima, WA 98902, USA
Summary
Erratum to: Advanced Practice Pharmacists: a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and cost of ClinicaL Pharmacist PractitionErs managing ambulatory Medicare patients in North Carolina (APPLE-NC) Erratum Following the publication of this article [1] it was brought to our attention that there was an error in the ‘Total cost’ paragraph of the ‘Results’ section.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have