Abstract
ABSTRACTThe equivalent initial flaw size (EIFS) concept was developed nearly 30 years ago in an attempt to account for the initial quality, both manufacturing and material properties, of a structural detail prone to fatigue cracking. Widespread use of this concept has been limited due to the large amount of test data required to develop a reliable EIFS distribution. In this effort, an EIFS distribution was determined for four types of flat, production like transport aircraft fuselage skin joints loaded by remote tension. Two crack growth prediction codes, AFGROW and FASTRAN, were used to not only develop the EIFS but also to compare the crack growth algorithms in each code. The EIFS calculations are prone to compounding errors in the crack growth analysis due to the changing stress intensity factor solutions and stress fields as the crack gets longer. Thus, only including EIFS calculations for mechanically small cracks, crack lengths less than 1.27 mm, results in a mean EIFS of 18.0 μm with a standard deviation of 3.78 μm.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
