Abstract

Using a UK panel data set drawn from 1675 Chief Executive Officer (CEO) year observations and 1540 Chief Financial Officer (CFO) year observations, we examine the relationship between CEO and CFO equity incentives and earnings management. In addition, we examine the moderation effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the relationship between executives’ equity incentives and earnings management. We use multivariate regression models to test our hypotheses. We find that CEO equity incentives are related to higher absolute and income increasing earnings management. These results support the managerial power theory argument that CEOs exploit equity-linked compensation to obtain more personal benefits without causing public anger. Contrary to CEO equity incentives, we could not find any significant relationship between CFO equity incentives and any of the earnings management proxies. In addition, we find that corporate governance quality (measured by individual mechanisms and overall index) has no effect on the relationship between executives’ equity incentives and earnings management. This result indicates that whereas some corporate governance mechanisms can reduce earnings management in general, they do not affect wealth driven incentives to manipulate accruals. In total, results question the effectiveness of the corporate governance system in mitigating opportunistic behavior motivated by executives’ compensation structures

Highlights

  • The major question addressed by this paper is whether equity-based compensation induces executives to manipulate earnings

  • Using a UK panel data set drawn from 1675 Chief Executive Officer (CEO) year observations and 1540 Chief Financial Officer (CFO) year observations, we examine the relationship between CEO and cash flow from operations (CFO) equity incentives and earnings management

  • We can reasonably claim that our results for the relationship between CEO equity incentives and earnings management are robust to the effect of endogeneity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The major question addressed by this paper is whether equity-based compensation induces executives to manipulate earnings. The authors claimed that the best way to create a direct link between managers’ and shareholders’ wealth is managerial stock ownership. These outcomes hastened US companies towards increasing adoption of equity-linked compensation that resulted in a significant increase in executives’ holdings of equity during the period of 1990s. This substantial growth in equity-linked compensation and stock ownership is evidenced by Hall and Murphy (2002) who report that median stock and option holdings of S&P 500 executives increased from $11 million in 1992 to more than $31 million by 1999

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call