Abstract

Simple SummaryHorses have superior athletic capabilities due largely to their exceptional cardiorespiratory responses during exercise. This has particular relevance to horses’ potential to experience breathlessness, especially when their athletic performance is reduced by impaired respiratory function. Breathlessness, incorporating three types of unpleasant experiences, has been noted as of significant animal welfare concern in other mammals. However, the potential for breathlessness to occur in horses as usually ridden wearing bitted bridles has not yet been evaluated in detail. Accordingly, key physiological responses to exercise and the consequences of impaired respiratory function are outlined. Then the physiological control of breathing and the generation of the aversive experiences of breathlessness are explained. Finally, the potential for horses with unimpaired and impaired respiratory function to experience the different types of breathlessness is evaluated. This information provides a basis for considering the circumstances in which breathlessness may have significant negative welfare impacts on horses as currently ridden wearing bitted bridles. Potential beneficial impacts on respiratory function of using bitless bridles are then discussed with emphasis on the underlying mechanisms and their relevance to breathlessness. It is noted that direct comparisons of cardiorespiratory responses to exercise in horses wearing bitless and bitted bridles are not available and it is recommended that such studies be undertaken.Horses engaged in strenuous exercise display physiological responses that approach the upper functional limits of key organ systems, in particular their cardiorespiratory systems. Maximum athletic performance is therefore vulnerable to factors that diminish these functional capacities, and such impairment might also lead to horses experiencing unpleasant respiratory sensations, i.e., breathlessness. The aim of this review is to use existing literature on equine cardiorespiratory physiology and athletic performance to evaluate the potential for various types of breathlessness to occur in exercising horses. In addition, we investigate the influence of management factors such as rein and bit use and of respiratory pathology on the likelihood and intensity of equine breathlessness occurring during exercise. In ridden horses, rein use that reduces the jowl angle, sometimes markedly, and conditions that partially obstruct the nasopharynx and/or larynx, impair airflow in the upper respiratory tract and lead to increased flow resistance. The associated upper airway pressure changes, transmitted to the lower airways, may have pathophysiological sequelae in the alveolae, which, in their turn, may increase airflow resistance in the lower airways and impede respiratory gas exchange. Other sequelae include decreases in respiratory minute volume and worsening of the hypoxaemia, hypercapnia and acidaemia commonly observed in healthy horses during strenuous exercise. These and other factors are implicated in the potential for ridden horses to experience three forms of breathlessness—”unpleasant respiratory effort”, “air hunger” and “chest tightness”—which arise when there is a mismatch between a heightened ventilatory drive and the adequacy of the respiratory response. It is not known to what extent, if at all, such mismatches would occur in strenuously exercising horses unhampered by low jowl angles or by pathophysiological changes at any level of the respiratory tract. However, different combinations of the three types of breathlessness seem much more likely to occur when pathophysiological conditions significantly reduce maximal athletic performance. Finally, most horses exhibit clear behavioural evidence of aversion to a bit in their mouths, varying from the bit being a mild irritant to very painful. This in itself is a significant animal welfare issue that should be addressed. A further major point is the potential for bits to disrupt the maintenance of negative pressure in the oropharynx, which apparently acts to prevent the soft palate from rising and obstructing the nasopharynx. The untoward respiratory outcomes and poor athletic performance due to this and other obstructions are well established, and suggest the potential for affected animals to experience significant intensities of breathlessness. Bitless bridle use may reduce or eliminate such effects. However, direct comparisons of the cardiorespiratory dynamics and the extent of any respiratory pathophysiology in horses wearing bitted and bitless bridles have not been conducted. Such studies would be helpful in confirming, or otherwise, the claimed potential benefits of bitless bridle use.

Highlights

  • There is something especially engaging about seeing healthy horses running free, alert, ears forward, nostrils flared, moving across the ground with ease, displaying exceptional musculoskeletal agility, control and power

  • It is obvious that the greater the levels of exercise demanded of horses in which the cross-sectional area of the upper airway is reduced by rein use or pathophysiology, the greater would be the likelihood that they would experience unpleasant sensations of respiratory effort, and, the greater would be the likely intensity of those experiences

  • Both unpleasant respiratory effort and air hunger are likely to be associated with the onset of severe exercise-induced pulmonary haemorrhage (EIPH) in racehorses engaged in strenuous exercise (Sections 4.1 and 4.2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is something especially engaging about seeing healthy horses running free, alert, ears forward, nostrils flared, moving across the ground with ease, displaying exceptional musculoskeletal agility, control and power. The possibility that specific elements of physiological and pathophysiological responses to exercise may predispose horses to experience “breathlessness”, representing unpleasant respiratory sensations identified recently as a significant welfare issue in other mammals [5], is considered here. Every evaluation of an animal’s general welfare status, or specific features of it, is hypothetical to the extent that it involves making inferences about what affects may be experienced Those inferences derive credibility from validated knowledge of the underlying systems physiology, neurophysiology and affective neuroscience, as from the caution exercised when inferring the presence of particular affects, for example, breathlessness, thirst and pain (e.g., [5,15,16,17]). Some implications of these and other related observations for equine welfare are discussed

Upper Airway Anatomy and Obligate Nasal Breathing
Upper Respiratory Tract Airflow Capacity and Resistance
Jowl Angle and Airflow Resistance
Airflow Resistance and Disorders of the Soft Palate and Nasopharyngeal Walls
Clustering of Multiple Upper Respiratory Tract Airflow Impediments
Lower Respiratory Tract Pathophysiology and Exercise
Breathing Mechanisms That Underlie Breathlessness
Likely Forms of Breathlessness in Exercising Horses
Some Implications of Bitted and Bitless Bridle Use
Behavioural Signs of Bit-Induced Pain and Discomfort
Mouth Behaviour of Feral Horses and Horses Wearing Bitless Bridles or Halters
Respiratory Functionality of a Closed Mouth in Exercising Horses
Bridle Type in Treadmill and Other Studies
Bridle Type and Potential Impacts on Breathlessness
Some Animal Welfare Implications
Breathlessness and Urging Racehorses to Sustain Maximal Exercise
Behaviours that Validly Indicate Horses’ Aversion to Bits
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.