Abstract
The principal epistemological characteristics of criminology have been, first, to conceptualize crime as an individual phenomenon and, second, to measure criminal behavior by definitions provided by domestic political authorities. What are the implications and sustaining factors of these criminological ways of knowing? Arguably, these epistemologies preclude a criminological analysis of behaviors that undermine the goals of a more just and peaceful world. Can we adopt, instead, an alternative framework that moves criminology toward emphasizing the globally harmful behaviors of the state? What would underlie a peacemaking criminology?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
