Abstract

Objective. There is renewed interest in epidural and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a therapy following spinal cord injury, both to reanimate paralyzed muscles as well as to potentiate weakened volitional control of movements. However, most work to date has focussed on lumbar SCS for restoration of locomotor function. Therefore, we examined upper-limb muscle responses and modulation of supraspinal-evoked movements by different frequencies of cervical SCS delivered to various epidural and transcutaneous sites in anaesthetized, neurologically intact monkeys. Approach. Epidural SCS was delivered via a novel multielectrode cuff placed around both dorsal and ventral surfaces of the cervical spinal cord, while transcutaneous SCS was delivered using a high carrier frequency through surface electrodes. Main results. Ventral epidural SCS elicited robust movements at lower current intensities than dorsal sites, with evoked motor unit potentials that reliably followed even high-frequency trains. By contrast, the muscle responses to dorsal SCS required higher current intensities and were attenuated throughout the train. However, dorsal epidural SCS and, to a lesser extent, transcutaneous SCS were effective at facilitating supraspinal-evoked responses, especially at intermediate stimulation frequencies. The time- and frequency-dependence of dorsal SCS effects could be explained by a simple model in which transynaptic excitation of motoneurons was gated by prior stimuli through presynaptic mechanisms. Significance. Our results suggest that multicontact electrodes allowing access to both dorsal and ventral epidural sites may be beneficial for combined therapeutic purposes, and that the interaction of direct, synaptic and presynaptic effects should be considered when optimising SCS-assisted rehabilitation.

Highlights

  • Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) have disastrous consequences for patients who face major visceral and motor impairments (Snoek et al 2004)

  • Recent years have seen considerable progress in the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to restore locomotor function. This was initially conceived as an alternative to direct functional electrical stimulation (FES) of muscles (Taylor, 2002, Guiraud, 2006) to engage surviving central pattern generator (CPG) circuitry deprived of supraspinal control (Dimitrijevic et al 1998, Minassian et al 2004)

  • We investigated whether SCS delivered via ventral epidural, dorsal epidural and dorsal transcutaneous electrodes could modulate muscle responses evoked from descending pathways

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) have disastrous consequences for patients who face major visceral and motor impairments (Snoek et al 2004). Clinical trials of epidural lumbar SCS revealed unexpected improvements in volitional control of the lower limbs, for example the ability to voluntarily lift the legs while lying down, even for people with injuries classified as clinically complete (Harkema et al 2011, Angeli et al 2018). This suggests that many clinicallycomplete lesions may be anatomically incomplete, and that SCS can raise the excitability of spinal circuits to unmask weakened but surviving descending pathways (Minassian et al 2016). In conjunction with extensive rehabilitation, these pathways may be strengthened to further support restoration of function (Van Den Brand et al 2012, McPherson et al 2015, Krucoff et al 2016, Duffell and Donaldson 2020)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call