Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of geriatric patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with ocular complaints and were referred for an ophthalmology consultation and to evaluate the efficacy of visual acuity (VA) as an indicator of urgency of care. Material and Methods: The data of 730 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Age, gender, presentation complaints, presentation time, pre-diagnoses made by the ED physician, definitive diagnosis, VA (logMAR) measurements and urgency of care were recorded. Results: The mean age of the patients was 72.7 ± 7.1 years. The percentage of patients presenting to ED during evening shift hours was 60.3%, and the rate of presentation on weekdays was 75.8% (p<0.05). The agreement rate between the pre-diagnosis of the ED physicians and the final diagnosis of the ophthalmologists was 65.2%. The most common reasons for presenting to ED were infection (21%) and trauma (19.9%). No pathological finding was present in 10.1%. According to the classification of urgency of care, 52.6% of the cases were evaluated as urgent, 24.3% as semi-urgent, and 23.1% as non-urgent. VA was the lowest (1.49 ± 1.06 logMAR) in the urgent group (p<0.01). Conclusion: We consider that low VA can be of great help in evaluating the urgency of geriatric patients presenting to ED. In addition, rather than ED, geriatric patients applying to health institutions where they can receive outpatient clinic service for non-emergency ocular diseases may allow ED to provide better service to other patients with more serious problems. Key Words: Geriatrics, Emergency department, Eye-related emergency, Ocular emergency

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call