Abstract
We investigate the putative Pliocene–Quaternary removal of mantle lithosphere from beneath the southern Sierra Nevada region using a synthesis of subsidence data from the Great Valley, and geomorphic relations across the Sierra Nevada. These findings are used to test the results and predictions of thermomechanical modeling of the lithosphere removal process that is specific to the Sierra Nevada, as presented in an accompanying paper referenced here as Part I. Our most successful thermomechanical model and the observational data that it explains are further bundled into an integrated physiographic evolution–geodynamic model for the three-dimensional epeirogenic deformation field that has affected mainly the southern Sierra Nevada–San Joaquin Basin region as a result of underlying mantle lithosphere removal. The coupled Sierra Nevada mountain range and Great Valley basin are recognized as a relatively rigid block (Sierra Nevada microplate) moving within the San Andreas–Walker Lane dextral plate juncture system. Our analysis recognizes that the Sierra Nevada possessed kilometer-scale local and regional paleotopographic relief, and that the Great Valley forearc basin possessed comparable structural relief on its principal stratigraphic horizons, both dating back to the end of Cretaceous time. Such ancient paleorelief must be accounted for in considering late Cenozoic components of uplift and subsidence across the microplate. We further recognize that Cenozoic rock and surface uplift must be considered from the perspectives of both local epeirogeny driven by mantle lithosphere removal, and regional far-field–forced epeirogeny driven by plate tectonics and regional upper-mantle buoyancy structure. Stratigraphic relations of Upper Cretaceous and lower Cenozoic marine strata lying on northern and southern Sierra Nevada basement provide evidence for near kilometer-scale rock uplift in the Cenozoic. Such uplift is likely to have possessed positive, and then superposed negative (subsidence) stages of relief generation, rendering net regional rock and surface uplift. Accounting for ancient paleorelief and far-field–driven regional uplift leaves a residual pattern whereby ∼1200 m of southeastern Sierra crest rock and similar surface uplift, and ∼700 m of spatially and temporally linked tectonic subsidence in the southern Great Valley were required in the late Cenozoic by mantle lithosphere removal. These values are close to the predictions of our modeling, but application of the model results to the observed geology is complicated by spatial and temporal variations in the regional tectonics that probably instigated mantle lithosphere removal, as well as spatial and temporal variations in the observed uplift and subsidence patterns. Considerable focus is given to these spatial-temporal variation patterns, which are interpreted to reflect a complex three-dimensional pattern resulting from the progressive removal of mantle lithosphere from beneath the region, as well as its epeirogenic expressions. The most significant factor is strong evidence that mantle lithosphere removal was first driven by an east-to-west pattern of delamination in late Miocene–Pliocene time, and then rapidly transitioned to a south-to-north pattern of delamination in the Quaternary.
Highlights
The late Cenozoic removal of mantle lithosphere from beneath the southern Sierra Nevada region has gained attention by virtue of its extraordinary geophysical documentation, and its diversity of geologic expression
The primary aim of this paper is to present new and to integrate existing constraints for late Cenozoic uplift and subsidence of the Sierra Nevada and Great Valley that appear to be related to this mantle lithosphere removal event, and to test the results of the Part I modeling against these observables
We focus on uplift and subsidence, which we interpret as the imprints of the epeirogenic deformation field resulting from mantle lithosphere removal in the southern Sierra Nevada region
Summary
The late Cenozoic removal of mantle lithosphere from beneath the southern Sierra Nevada region has gained attention by virtue of its extraordinary geophysical documentation (cf. Jones et al, 1994, 2004; Ruppert et al, 1998; Zandt et al, 2004; Reeg, 2008; Frassetto et al, 2011; Gilbert et al, 2012), and its diversity of geologic expression (cf. Ducea and Saleeby, 1996, 1998a; Manley et al, 2000; Saleeby and Foster, 2004; Farmer et al, 2002). Basement rock exposures of the Late Cretaceous extended terrane are characterized by widespread depositional remnants of Maastrichtian to middle Eocene clastic marine strata (Cox, 1987; Lucas and Reynolds, 1991; Grove, 1993; Wood and Saleeby, 1998; Monastero et al, 2002; Lofgren et al, 2008; Chapman et al, 2012) These depositional remnants sit in structural positions suggestive of formation in supradetachment basins, and/or active graben-horst systems, and they further indicate the development of a continental borderland across the southernmost Sierra Nevada, western Mojave, and restored Salinia in conjunction with extensional tectonism.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
