EOSINOPHILIC MYOPERICARDITIS: A CASE SERIES

Abstract

Abstract Background Eosinophilic myocarditis is characterized by acute myocardial inflammation due to eosinophilic tissue infiltration. Methods Diagnosis was based on laboratory tests, Echo and CMR; EMB was performed in uncertain cases. Treatment was performed according to the etiology of EM. All patients underwent regular follow–up at our Center. Results This study includes 9 patients (89% Caucasian, 78% women, mean age 48.2±13.6 years), admitted in our Center from February 2021 to November 2023. 66.67% cases occurred in the setting of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 11% was secondary to B–cell lymphoblastic leukemia, and 22% were labelled as idiopathic EM. All patients presented with high eosinophil count (6133±4893/mcL), elevated CRP (57±66 mg/L) and hs–troponin I (3610±5166 ng/L) levels, and 67% cases NT–proBNP (10751±4038 ng/L) was elevated. 67% patients presented with dyspnea, 56% with chest pain, and 56% with fever. On ECG, sinus tachycardia, low QRS voltages and ST segment depression with negative T–waves were common. Thickening of the myocardial walls with reduction of GLS was seen in all cases; in 44% cases, the EF was below 50%; 56% cases had mild pericardial effusion. 1 patient had intraventricular thrombi at CMR, another one had bilateral pulmonary embolism. On CMR, all patients had areas of hypokinesia, myocardial edema, and myo–pericardial late gadolinium enhancement. EMB was performed in 5 cases, confirming the presence of intramyocardial eosinophilic infiltrates. 7 patients required CICU, and 1 needed inotrope (dobutamine) use. The patient with ALL was treated with combined chemotherapy. The other EM cases were treated with immunosuppressive therapy consisting of corticosteroids and either cyclophosphamide or rituximab or mepolizumab. All patients received cardioprotective therapy with BBs and ACE–inhibitors; in patients with pericardial involvement, colchicine was administered. All patients showed rapid clinical improvement following immunosuppressive therapy initiation, with prompt reduction of circulating eosinophils and hs–troponin I values and normalization of the ejection fraction. On CMR imaging, edema disappeared at follow–up, with LGE replacement in one case. All patients were alive and in good conditions at the last follow–up. Conclusions EM is an underdiagnosed life–threatening disease. A careful assessment of the etiology, as prompt therapy, is mandatory to achieve clinical amelioration and good mid–term prognosis.