Abstract

Cellulose acetate (CA)-based materials, like cigarette filters, contribute to landscape pollution challenging municipal authorities and manufacturers. This study investigates the potential of enzymes to degrade CA and to be potentially incorporated into the respective materials, enhancing biodegradation. Deacetylation studies based on Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Time of Flight (LC-MS-TOF), High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), and spectrophotometric analysis showed that the tested esterases were able to deacetylate the plasticizer triacetin (glycerol triacetate) and glucose pentaacetate (cellulose acetate model compound). The most effective esterases for deacetylation belong to the enzyme family 2 (AXE55, AXE 53, GAE), they deacetylated CA with a degree of acetylation of up to 1.8. A combination of esterases and cellulases showed synergistic effects, the absolute glucose recovery for CA 1.8 was increased from 15% to 28% when an enzymatic deacetylation was performed. Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase (LPMO), and cellobiohydrolase were able to cleave cellulose acetates with a degree of acetylation of up to 1.4, whereas chitinase showed no activity. In general, the degree of substitution, chain length, and acetyl group distribution were found to affect CA degradation. This study shows that, for a successful enzyme-based deacetylation system, a cocktail of enzymes, which will randomly cleave and generate shorter CA fragments, is the most suitable.

Highlights

  • Cellulose acetate (CA), produced from high-quality cellulose materials obtained from cotton or wood dissolving pulp, is used in many consumer products

  • Hydrolysis of triacetin was studied since this compound is used as was investigated

  • Major differences were seen for acetyl xylan esterases acetyl xylan and Axetyl xylan xylanestarase estarase (AXE) O),glucose pentaacetate (GPA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cellulose acetate (CA), produced from high-quality cellulose materials obtained from cotton or wood dissolving pulp, is used in many consumer products. Other sources of CA pollution are cigarette filters and textiles, which end up as litter, causing multiple problems in the environment [3,4]. This is true for cigarette filters, which are inappropriately disposed by smokers. An investigation in the USA showed that 25–50% of all litter items collected on streets and roadways were cigarette butts [5]. Developing biodegradable cigarette filters may help to overcome pollution and reduce effort in litter cleanup activities.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call