Abstract
The 2015 Paris Agreement, complementing the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, showcases an impressive consensus on climatological rhetoric. Thereby, it will contribute certainly neither to achieving its overall objectives on temperature nor to redressing any of the resulting “loss [or] damage” yet possibly to continuing the worldwide dialogue on the environment or on ecological entitlements. This paper will dissect and categorize these. It will conclude that the framers essentially kept the conversation going, nationally and internationally, encouraging the establishment, the adjudicatory branch, and the public to resume the conceptual or practical advancement on the topic
Highlights
RESUMO: O acordo de Paris de 2015, complementando a Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre a Mudança do Clima, apresenta um impressionante consenso na retórica climatológica
ISSN 1982-7636. pp. 01-15 www.redp.uerj.br continuing the worldwide dialogue on the environment or on ecological entitlements
P may, under usual circumstances, rightfully insist on her individual entitlements or on indemnification when she confronts a personalized infliction as a consequence of D’s ecologically harmful negligence or maliciousness. Her allegations may center on a supposed breach of her guaranties as a landowner. She may allege an encroachment upon her environmental entitlements, if her land forgoes none of its market valuation or perceptible beauty
Summary
RESUMO: O acordo de Paris de 2015, complementando a Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre a Mudança do Clima, apresenta um impressionante consenso na retórica climatológica.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
