Abstract
The main anthropogenic emissions (CO, CO2, NOx, SOx) produced by the processing (combustion) of wastes (coal filter cakes) were measured directly for the first time. The research considered the most widespread coal filter cakes: those of nonbaking, low-caking, coking, flame, and gas coals. These filter cakes are regarded as promising components for the technologies of coal-water slurry (CWS) and coal-water slurry containing petrochemicals (CWSP). According to our estimates, the annual increment of such wastes in the world is as high as 100 million tons. Consequently, the effective utilization of these wastes in the power industry is of high interest. The evaluation of hazardous emissions from the combustion of such wastes shows that filter cakes produce a similar amount of CO and CO2 as the initially-used coals but filter cakes are more cost-effective. We have established that CWS and CWSP technologies can be used to reduce NOx and SOx emissions. To reduce CO and CO2 emissions when burning filter cakes, we need to switch to low-temperature combustion. Lowering the combustion temperature of filter cakes from 850 °C down to 650 °C decreases the underburning insignificantly while decreasing CO and CO2 emissions by 30–40%.
Highlights
Conventional energy resources are decreasing at an alarming rate
With coal-water slurry (CWS) and CWSP, the main emphasis is on the use of low-rank coals, organic wastes, and black oils [8,9,10]
Additional experiments with initial coals of these filter cakes evaluate the possible hazard of coal processing wastes
Summary
Conventional energy resources are decreasing at an alarming rate (recent forecasts have not been rosy, see for example [1]). Environmental concerns about the emissions of carbon and sulfur oxides are quite significant [3,4,5] even when using the highest-quality coal (the reserves of such coals are limited as well) [6,7]. In this context, sustainable technologies become very attractive by providing ways to use wastes of fuel production—in particular, from coals and oils—or to develop new coal-water fuel compositions [8]. No findings—experimental nor theoretical—have been published to prove the possibility to minimize greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere when using CWS and CWSP instead of coal
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
