Abstract

Recognizing the factors responsible for the gradual increase in greenhouse gas [e.g. carbon dioxide (CO2)] emissions is crucial to reduce the detrimental consequences on environmental sustainability and human life. Accordingly, spotting the sectors which contribute the most to CO2 emissions and dampen economic growth have become one of the major concerns for policymakers around the globe. Against this background, this paper examines the nexus between economic growth and CO2 emissions in three Baltic countries namely Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Thus, the study basically checks the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by taking into account the role of energy consumption and financial development over the period of 1990–2018. This type of study is highly important for the region in order to comply with the commitments of the Paris Agreement and Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations. The study first employs appropriate testing procedures and second-generation panel data methods to account for cross-sectional dependency and slope heterogeneity among countries. Applying unit roots and cointegration tests, the study then employed different mean group estimation models and heterogeneous panel causality methods suitable for cross-sectionally dependent and heterogeneous panels. The results of the econometric analyses reveal that the inverted U-shaped EKC hypothesis does not hold in the Baltic countries. But the pollution haven hypothesis is evidenced to hold for these nations. By boosting the CO2 emissions figures, again, the study also revealed that higher levels of energy consumption exhibit adverse environmental consequences. Financial development is found to be effective in explaining the variations in the CO2 emission figures of the selected countries as well. Causality test results confirm bi-directional causality between economic growth and CO2 emissions, energy use and CO2 emissions, CO2 emissions and financial development, energy use and economic growth as well as between energy use and financial development. Furthermore, country-specific impacts are found to be similar to the corresponding panel estimates. Consistent with the findings, the study finally puts forward some policy-level suggestions. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Baltic countries need to move away from fossil-fuel dependent energy consumption growth policies to mitigate environmental degradation.

Highlights

  • Global warming is the most critical environmental challenge of our age

  • The term ‘ln’ stands for natural logarithm. ­CO2 refers to carbon dioxide emissions measured in metric tons per capita used as a proxy for environmental degradation, Y stands for gross domestic product (GDP) per capita to indicate income, and ­Y2 is the squared term of Y which is basically used to check the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC)

  • This segment of the findings resonates with the results obtained by, for example, Destek and Sinha (2020) for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in the OECD countries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global warming is the most critical environmental challenge of our age. climate change—an impact of global warming—has become a global threat to sustainable development (Destek and Sarkodie 2019). This study employs annual data on per capita ­CO2 emissions, GDP per capita, energy consumption and financial development for the Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) over the period 19902018. The study tests the existence of the EKC hypothesis by investing the effects of economic growth, energy consumption and financial development on C­ O2 emissions.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call