Abstract
Soil hydrocarbon-contamination represents an environmental threat even at remote locations such as Antarctica. In order to restore these soils, bioremediation, and biostimulation in particular, have proven to be an effective approach. However, large scale bioremediation schemes under the extreme environmental conditions of this continent provide a big uncertainty upon the robustness and reproducibility of these treatments. In this work, we compared the efficiency of two consecutive year field assays using 0.5 ton biopiles at Carlini Station, in order to identify those factors that affect the reproducibility of the pre-optimized biostimulation. First year field assay (biopiles I) reached >75% of hydrocarbon removal, while second year (biopiles II) only removed 55% of the total hydrocarbons. Several biological and physicochemical variables were statistically analyzed for both years' biopiles in order to identify the source of these differences. Total sunlight hours resulted to be the key factor driving removal efficiency in these treatments by increasing soil temperature inside the biopiles, and therefore, total biological activity and degrading bacterial counts in soil. This work represents the first study on the reproducibility of field assays in extreme environments such as Antarctica, and it provides a novel input to the scarce knowledge on field hydrocarbon bioremediation practices in cold regions.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
