Environmental controls on the interannual variability in chlorophyll and phytoplankton community structure within the seasonal sub surface chlorophyll maximum in the western English channel

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

The subsurface chlorophyll maximum (SCM) is increasingly recognised as an important but understudied locus of primary production particularly in shelf seas. Here we report the results of a 4 year, repeat station, summer sampling programme (2013–2016) of a seasonally recurrent SCM in the Western English Channel. Interannual variability in phytoplankton community structure and chlorophyll distribution and intensity was strongly related to water column stability at the depth interval of the SCM and also to water temperature. The phytoplankton community was statistically distinct in each year. High stability, as evidenced by large Richardson numbers and a well-developed strong thermocline appeared to favour the growth of larger dinoflagellates (autotrophs or mixotrophs) and diatoms. Such conditions led to development of the most intense SCMs and these were sometimes dominated by a single or a few key species most prominently in 2015 with near monospecific concentrations of the dinoflagellate Tripos fusus with average peak SCM chlorophyll concentrations of 7.3 ± 4.4 μg l−1. By contrast, in years with low water column stability and intermittent turbulence at the thermocline (2014, 2016) there was greater chlorophyll dispersal and less intense SCM. In these low stability conditions, red fluorescent nano-phytoplankton, such as naked dinoflagellates, chlorophytes and prymnesiophytes, made a greater contribution to the community, possibly as a result of the advantages that motility and enhanced light utilisation efficiency confer within an SCM exposed to turbulence. It is also likely that turbulence disrupted the stability required by the larger dinoflagellates and diatoms. Several of the key SCM taxa were absent from surface waters including the dinoflagellates Tripos fusus, Tripos lineatus, and most of the Rhizosolenia/Proboscia diatoms, consistent with adaptations more suited to survival at depth in stratified waters. These traits include luxury nutrient uptake and storage and survival in low light (both groups) and mixotrophy (dinoflagellates). On the other hand, in 2013, diatoms including Pseudo-nitzschia spp. were abundant in both surface, SCM and bottom waters. The relatively cooler waters (11.6–12.1 °C on average in 2013 and 2016) were characterised by smaller diatoms (Chaetoceros spp. and Pseudo-nitzschia spp.) whereas the warmer waters (13.1 °C on average in 2014) contained larger diatoms (large Rhizosolenia spp., Lauderia annulata and Leptocylindrus danicus). There did not appear to be continuity of key species between years, other than for the dinoflagellate Tripos lineatus, which was significant in both 2013 and 2014 and present in 2015. In any given year, there was no correspondence between the key spring bloom phytoplankton species as monitored in the nearby Western Channel Observatory L4 station and the key SCM taxa.