Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions associated with Portland cement (PC) production is ranked as the highest among the construction materials and it is estimated that 8% of the worlds CO2 discharges is due to PC production. As an average, the production of PC clinker including calcination process generates 0.81 kg of carbon dioxide per one kg of cement. Hence, new approaches which limit the negative environmental impacts of cement production and are aimed at the development of advanced methodologies are introduced. Implementation of lower energy consumption materials in production, which could moderately substitute PC in binders, can be addressed as one of the probable methods in mitigating environmental risks. Therefore, alternative binders fit into the most promising solutions. Present research investigates the environmental impact of the building sector, if an alternative to PC binder is used. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used in this research to assess the environmental impact of the alternative ternary gypsum-PC-pozzolan binder in the production of mortar, and the environmental benefits were calculated and compared to traditional cement-based building materials. Phosphogypsum was considered as a secondary raw material, as in the current approach it is collected in open stacks bringing environmental concerns. SimaPro LCA software with the Ecoinvent database was used for most of the calculation processes. Results indicate that with alternative binders up to 30% of energy can be saved and 57 wt.% of CO2 emissions can be reduced, bringing positive impact on the construction industries contribution to the environment.

Highlights

  • According to the data of the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2019), 7% of the worlds CO2 discharges are caused due to cement production, and it is ranked as the maximum contributor among construction materials [1,2]

  • The partial cement replacement with Metakaolin containing waste (MKW) reduced the total energy demand to 4.0 GJ, which was associated with a lower energy demand needed to produce MKW

  • A total of 93.6% of concrete energy demand was associated with Portland cement (PC), and the amount of PC was lower in the concrete and in the reviewed case it was 460 kg/m3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the data of the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2019), 7% of the worlds CO2 discharges are caused due to cement production, and it is ranked as the maximum contributor among construction materials [1,2]. Serious risk factors related to cement use (hexavalent chromium, exposure to allergens, or free crystalline silica) can result in harmful health consequences to humans [5]. New approaches that limit the negative environmental impacts of cement production and are aimed at the development of advanced methodologies were introduced [6,7]. Various kinds of supplementary cementitious materials were used to replace PC from 5 to 40 wt.% with different efficiency [9,10]. Another approach is to develop and use an entirely different type of binder. As such, calcined gypsum and cement hybrid systems can fit in to the most appealing solutions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call