Abstract
In the absence of uncertainty, an incumbent that attempts to prevent entry of rival firms can have no incentive to offer a most-favored-customer (MFC) clause because it could lead to higher post-entry prices. Our analysis suggests that this is not necessarily the case under uncertainty. In the presence of uncertainty, the incumbent can set a limit price that affects the entry decision. Limit pricing involves a pre-entry price different from the static monopoly price, which leads to a signaling cost. We show that part of this cost can be distributed over several periods by means of consumer refunds from the MFC clause. If the discount factor is not very high, the incumbent adopts this pricing and prevents entry to a larger extent.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
