Abstract

Research in the international business and social psychology literature has explicitly or implicitly adopted the intellectual capital or developmental perspective and demonstrated a positive relationship between entrepreneur foreign study experience and creativity and innovation. In a departure, we argue that entrepreneur foreign study experience does not necessarily benefit firm innovation. Adopting institutional and resource substitution perspectives, we examine conditions under which the positive relationship found in prior research may or may not hold. We argue that institutional forces condition the extent to which intellectual capital associated with foreign study experience benefits innovation, while resources via local connections and political participation substitute such intellectual capital. Using a unique large dataset of private firm entrepreneurs in China, we found that returnee entrepreneur participation in political system, membership in communist party, and firm Guanxi orientation weakened the positive effect of foreign study experience on firm innovation. Contrary to our prediction, local government support for private business attenuated rather than strengthened the relationship.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.