Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationship between language, knowledge and hermeneutics, through the so-called linguistic and pragmatic turn, in order to contribute with the study of philosophy of and within law and to the comprehension of the proposal of some theoretical patriotic who have been seeking to develop hermeneutic alternatives in face of the interpretational crisis which devastates the national context, such as Lenio Streck and Eros Grau. For such, starting from deductive reasoning, without exhaustive pretension, the paper proposes a historical foreshortening about the evolution of knowledge paradigms in the field of philosophy, going from the philosophy of being (objectivist), passing through the philosophy of consciousness (subjectivist) – both lying in the subject-object scheme – until reaching the philosophy of language, which finally composes a new scheme paved on the subject-subject relation, from the incursion of the pragmatics in the study of language. Lastly, and to contextualize this pragmatic incursion, the contributions of Martin Heidegger and Second Wittgenstein are briefly exposed and the philosophy of language is presented from these philosophers as a widening for the development of a new hermeneutics.Keywords: Linguistic and pragmatic turn, subject-object scheme, Martin Heidegger, Ludwig Wittgenstein.

Highlights

  • Filosofia e direito sempre foram (=deveriam-ser) disciplinas essencialmente conexas: a crença nesta assertiva justifica a abordagem e a leitura desenvolvidas

  • Torna-se possível apresentar uma crise de desvelamento de sentido no exercício de intepretação e aplicação do direito

  • 10 “Ora, para Heidegger, é aqui o ligar originário da linguagem: linguagem só pode ser adequadamente pensada a partir da temporalização do tempo enquanto evento de revelação [...] A temporalidade emerge, assim, como o próprio sentido do cuidado, com seus três êxtases fundamentais: futuro (se-adiante-de-si-mesmo), passado (já-ser-em), presente (estar-junto-das-coisas) e seus esquemas, o que supera a concepção metafísica de tempo toda ela orientada para o presente

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Filosofia e direito sempre foram (=deveriam-ser) disciplinas essencialmente conexas: a crença nesta assertiva justifica a abordagem e a leitura desenvolvidas.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.