Abstract

Filmmaker Andrei Tarkovski wrote he often wondered if it was worth writing about cinema. Wouldn't it be better just make films and find practical solutions to theoretical problems throughout the work? Although there was doubt, he bet on writing as a way to transform the plane of the ordinary where one acts in theme of investigation and, thus, capture, with the text, bulges in the perpetual flow of the real. In dialogue with Tarkovski, we can understand writing as a toll of attention to teaching – write about it, produce fiction about it and disturb the pedagogical thinking investing in a non-essentialized way, mobilizing, in writing, the marks and singularities of our pedagogical experiences. Aligned with Nietzsche's writing, a self- genealogical scripture is produced as an exercise, in a practice that is not restricted to an individual, but extends to a broader field of forces of which he or she belongs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.