Abstract
The article provides results of a comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of involving the state enterprise “InformationJudicial Systems” and private entities to the development and implementation of the Unified Judicial Information and TelecommunicationSystem in Ukraine. The “backlog” of the plan for the development and implementation of the UJITS is related to the lowefficiency of economic activity of the state enterprise “Information Judicial Systems”, which maintains an “administrative monopoly”on the establishment of the UJITS.Due to obtaining data about the activities of this state-owned enterprise, the author concludes that nowadays state enterprise“Information Judicial Systems” has an adequate financial, human and production potential for the development of the UJITS. At thesame time, the author sums up that due to a lack of competition the company’s specialists are not motivated in the fastest developmentof this information and telecommunication product, and the enterprise involves additional entities to fulfill the state order, which actuallyleads to unjustified and irrational spending of state budget. In this regard, it is shown as perspective the involvement of otherlicensed business entities (including private ones) on a competitive basis to the development of the Unified Judicial Information andTelecommunication System.Execution of the state order on a competitive basis will indicate the restriction of “administrative monopoly”, promote competitionand ultimately intensify the development and implementation of the UJITS in Ukraine. In order to prevent the risks of untimely,improper provision or non-provision of information services for the development of the UJITS, the author considers it appropriate toenvisage in the state contract (agreement) enhanced economic-law responsibility of the contractor and oblige to provide commensuratewith the cost of the state order insurance of the proper execution of their obligations.The legislator needs special attention in case of involvement to the UJITS developers on a competitive basis in managing therisks of leakage and dissemination of information about the peculiarities of the UJITS operation, prevention of unauthorized interfe -rence in the system, distortion of information contained in the UJITS after its establishment.
Highlights
The “backlog” of the plan for the development and implementation of the UJITS is related to the low efficiency of economic activity of the state enterprise “Information Judicial Systems”, which maintains an “administrative monopoly” on the establishment of the UJITS
Due to obtaining data about the activities of this state-owned enterprise, the author concludes that nowadays state enterprise “Information Judicial Systems” has an adequate financial, human and production potential for the development of the UJITS
The author sums up that due to a lack of competition the company’s specialists are not motivated in the fastest development of this information and telecommunication product, and the enterprise involves additional entities to fulfill the state order, which leads to unjustified and irrational spending of state budget. It is shown as perspective the involvement of other licensed business entities on a competitive basis to the development of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System
Summary
Метою даної роботи є порівняльний аналіз переваг та недоліків залучення державного підприємства «Інформаційні судові системи» та приватних суб’єктів господарювання до розроблення та запровадження ЄСІТС в Україні. Що наказом No 99 «Про забезпечення створення і функціонування Єдиної судової інформаційно-телекомунікаційної системи» від 2 березня 2018 р.14 ДСА України визначила ДП «Інформаційні судові системи» адміністратором з побудови ЄСІТС та одержувачем бюджетних коштів на її створення.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call