Abstract
Ensembles of general circulation model (GCM) integrations yield predictions for meteorological conditions in future months. Such predictions have implicit uncertainty resulting from model structure, parameter uncertainty, and fundamental randomness in the physical system. In this work, we build probabilistic models for long-term forecasts that include the GCM ensemble values as inputs but incorporate statistical correction of GCM biases and different treatments of uncertainty. Specifically, we present, and evaluate against observations, several versions of a probabilistic forecast for gridded air temperature 1 month ahead based on ensemble members of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2). We compare the forecast performance against a baseline climatology based probabilistic forecast, using average information gain as a skill metric. We find that the error in the CFSv2 output is better represented by the climatological variance than by the distribution of ensemble members because the GCM ensemble sometimes suffers from unrealistically little dispersion. Lack of ensemble spread leads a probabilistic forecast whose variance is based on the ensemble dispersion alone to underperform relative to a baseline probabilistic forecast based only on climatology, even when the ensemble mean is corrected for bias. We also show that a combined regression based model that includes climatology, temperature from recent months, trend, and the GCM ensemble mean yields a probabilistic forecast that outperforms approaches using only past observations or GCM outputs. Improvements in predictive skill from the combined probabilistic forecast vary spatially, with larger gains seen in traditionally hard to predict regions such as the Arctic.
Highlights
General circulation models (GCMs) that represent atmosphere, ocean and land surface processes can be run to make meteorological predictions weeks to months ahead
This paper builds on previous work on the statistical calibration of seasonal predictions of a one GCM ensemble in the case where these projections are expressed as probabilities of each climatology tercile [10]
negative log likelihood (NLL) measures the probability of an observation occurring in a distribution, with lower NLL indicating a better probabilistic model. c0 was used as the baseline model for all the comparisons
Summary
General circulation models (GCMs) that represent atmosphere, ocean and land surface processes can be run to make meteorological predictions weeks to months ahead. Such long-term or seasonal-scale predictions are not very reliable because uncertainties in initial conditions and in model structure get amplified over time, they are still expected to contain useful information because there are sources of predictability, such as the Southern Oscillation, for this timescale. Given the limited GCM skill at these timescales, though, much work remains to be done to convert ensemble predictions into well-calibrated, reliable forecasts [1]. This paper builds on previous work on the statistical calibration of seasonal predictions of a one GCM ensemble in the case where these projections are expressed as probabilities of each climatology tercile [10]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have