Abstract
BackgroundfMRI in clinical settings faces challenges affecting activity maps. Template matching can screen for abnormal results by providing an objective metric of activity map quality. This research tests how sample size, age, or gender-specific templates, and unilateral templates affect template matching results. New MethodWe used an fMRI database of 76 healthy subjects performing 7 tasks assessing motor, language, and working memory functions. Templates were created with varying numbers of subjects, genders, and ages. Individual subjects were compared to templates using leave-one-out cross validation. We also compared unilateral and bilateral templates. ResultsIncreasing sample size improved template matches, with diminishing returns for larger sample sizes. Gender and age-specific templates increased correlations for some tasks, with age having a larger effect than gender. Generally, templates including all subjects provided the highest correlations, indicating that age and gender effects did not outweigh the benefits of larger sample sizes. Unilateral templates of the task-dominant hemisphere increased template correlations. ConclusionsAge and gender affect templates, but the benefits depend on the database size. When the database is large enough, age and gender effects are beneficial. Unilateral templates enhance template matching, but practical benefits depend on the severity of neurological abnormalities in patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.