Abstract

Recovery factor for gas reservoirs are highly dependent on factors such as initial reservoir pressure, abandonment pressure and the type of reservoir drive mechanism. Producing gas reservoirs with active water drive mechanism possess a lot of challenge to the field operator since optimum production of gas is dependent on reduced pressure. Material balance model was used to derive basic reservoir and production parameters thereafter Excel was used to simulate the parameters for both conventional and co-production scenarios using a field data from the Niger Delta Basin. The reservoir contains three producing wells with conventional technique, while co-production has three wells, producing gas from the up-dip and one well producing water from the down-dip. The simulated results show that gas production rate from the three wells changed with respect to the production strategies. Under conventional, gas production rate from the three wells was at a constant rate of 19MMSCF/D for a long period of time. However, under co-production technique, gas production rate was at a constant rate of 38MMSCF/D for a short period of time. Under conventional method, 231.85BCF of gas was recovered from 356.713BCF of gas initially-in-place with recovery factor of 65% until water cut set-in at an abandonment pressure of 2000 psia. However, under co-production technique, the simulated result shows that there was an optimum recovery of gas of up to 92% recovery which is 27% above the conventional technique and the reservoir pressure was depleted to 1000 psia before water cut set-in. Key words: Co-production, Niger Delta Basin, gas production, material balance model, gas reservoir.

Highlights

  • Gas reservoirs can be classified, according to drive mechanism; depletion-drive or water-drive type

  • Conventional and co-production techniques production strategies were used for evaluation and optimization of gas recovery from the Water Drive Gas Reservoir

  • Gas production rate from well F-1, F-2 and F-3 was at constant rate of 19 MMSCF/D for a longer period of time under conventional technique while for co-production, gas production rate was at constant rate of 38 MMSCF/D for a shorter period of time (Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gas reservoirs can be classified, according to drive mechanism; depletion-drive or water-drive type. Ultimate recovery from depletion-drive gas reservoirs is limited only by the minimum reservoir pressure, economically possible. Ultimate recovery from water-drive gas reservoirs is governed primarily by physical properties such as the residual gas saturation behind the water front and by the amount of free gas left up-dip above the highest perforation. At abandonment, this gas is generally at a much higher pressure than that experienced in a depletion-drive reservoir. It is an attempt to deplete the reservoir faster than the aquifer can respond resulting in lowering reservoir abandonment pressure

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call