Abstract
This paper explores the distribution of different relativisation strategies, namely, the whrelatives, that and zero, in diaries written in Australia in the last decades of the eighteenth century and throughout the nineteenth century. Several factors have been considered in order to determine the reasons behind the choice of these strategies: gender, period, status, syntactic position and animacy of the antecedent. According to the results, wh-relatives were more likely to be used in the first half of the nineteenth century. In addition, the authors with low or average education tended to favour the use of non-case marked relatives to the detriment of wh-relatives. By contrast, gender was determined not to have played a role in the selection of relativisers. Furthermore, syntactic position and animacy of the antecedent also influenced the relative markers that could be present in a specific syntactic slot.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have