Abstract
This article delineates and analyzes the syntactic and semantic parameters of variation exhibited by English filler - gap constructions . It demonstrates that a detailed, fully explicit account of the observed variation is available within a framework embracing the notion ‘grammatical construction’. This account, which explicates similarities and differences among topicalization, interrogatives, relatives, exclamatives, and comparative correlatives in terms of linguistic types and hierarchical constraint inheritance, is articulated in detail within the framework of sign - based construction grammar (SBCG), a version of head - driven phrase structure grammar (HPSG) integrating key insights from Berkeley construction grammar . The results presented here stand as a challenge to any analysis incorporating transformational operations, especially proposals couched within Chomsky’s ‘Minimalist program’.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
