Abstract
This article discusses the interpretation of the doctrine of the Trinity by K. Nürnberger from the perspective of an appreciation of his intellectual and theological accomplishment, especially as expressed in the publication of his systematic theology in 2016. Nürnberger’s distinct understanding of the Trinity is mapped with reference to five perspectives: the structural place in the overall treatment of the Christian faith, an estimation of Patristic theology, the relative importance of the doctrine, the category for interpretation and, finally, the ‘point’ of the Trinitarian confession. To establish some form of evaluative frame of reference, the so-called Trinitarian Renaissance is briefly described. The article concludes with a preliminary evaluation, expressing concern about Nürnberger’s negative view of the Patristic interpretation, the shift from a focus on God’s nature and identity to human experience, a modernist conception about intelligibility and the dismissal of mystery and a general truncation of the heuristic potential of the doctrine.Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: The article is an intra-disciplinary study. It addresses the view of a fellow systematic theological scholar (K Nürnberger). At stake is the impact of different research paradigms within the same discipline. In this case, the engagement is between the paradigms of realist-experiential versus critical-metaphysical. Different results emerge from this.
Highlights
AppreciationWhen a comprehensive history of theology in South Africa is written, the name of Klaus Nürnberger will occupy a prominent place
I still recall the excitement when Johan Heyns’s Dogmatiek was published in 1978, and I discovered that Nürnberger already had completed his work – Sistematiese Teologie – in 1975
I did not expect that this would happen in South Africa with its small community of systematic theologians
Summary
AppreciationWhen a comprehensive history of theology in South Africa is written, the name of Klaus Nürnberger will occupy a prominent place. 2.One cannot but be reminded by Webster (2003) that the Word is a function of the doctrine of God, and in a Christian sense of the Trinity.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have