Abstract

In the United States, treatment as a state (TAS) provisions enable eligible Native American tribes to assume the same responsibilities as state governments in setting and implementing water quality standards (WQSs). Following the introduction of TAS through 1987 amendments to the US Clean Water Act (CWA), forty-four US tribes have enacted TAS tribal standards, which may be more stringent than those of neighboring states; can incorporate cultural and/or ceremonial uses; and can be used to influence pollution levels coming from upstream, off-reservation users. To evaluate TAS as a model for Indigenous water co-governance, we examine how Native American tribes are advancing tribal sovereignty and environmental sustainability through TAS, and we engage with conflicting views on whether and how Indigenous self-determination can be advanced through existing bureaucratic and colonial governance systems. We specifically analyze environmental pollutant listings in tribal water quality standards for the forty-four TAS tribes. Findings suggest that TAS tribes are creating more culturally relevant WQSs, which are typically as comprehensive as, and often more stringent than, analogous state regulations. Tribal standards are diverse, and TAS tribes can set standards independently from neighboring states and one another. Further analysis reveals the complexities of TAS policy, whereby colonial entanglements both enable and constrain enhanced Indigenous self-determination.

Highlights

  • In the United States, treatment as a state (TAS) provisions enable eligible Native American tribes to assume the same responsibilities as state governments in setting and implementing water quality standards ( WQSs)

  • Approved through the 1987 amendments to the US Clean Water Act, TAS provisions enable eligible Native American tribes to assume the same responsibilities as state governments for setting and implementing water quality standards ( WQSs) for tribal lands and waters

  • Recognizing the challenges tribes can face in pursuing self-determination through colonial governance structures, we considered whether TAS tribes had sufficient independence from states and federal agencies to create unique environmental pollutant listings for tribal WQSs, as opposed to duplicating state listings or regional-level EPA templates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the United States, treatment as a state (TAS) provisions enable eligible Native American tribes to assume the same responsibilities as state governments in setting and implementing water quality standards ( WQSs). Approved through the 1987 amendments to the US Clean Water Act, TAS provisions enable eligible Native American tribes to assume the same responsibilities as state governments for setting and implementing water quality standards ( WQSs) for tribal lands and waters. Forty-four tribes have established their own WQSs, which are approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, n.d.-a) and are implemented through tribal environmental programs (see Figure 1) Both tribes and states are legally required to meet or exceed federal minimums for their WQSs. Under the CWA policy, tribes and states can determine their own water quality goals in the form of “beneficial uses,” which can include cultural or ceremonial uses for tribal waters (Anderson 2015; Grijalva 2006). Upheld by the US Supreme Court, Isleta’s WQSs led the city of Albuquerque, located just a few miles upstream from Isleta farmlands and ceremonial areas, to upgrade a wastewater treatment plant (Baker 1996; Bilut 1994; Lenderman 1998)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call