Abstract
ABSTRACT: By a decision dated 28 April 2009, the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam granted enforcement of four arbitral awards annulled by the Russian courts under the New York Convention of 1958. The Dutch Supreme Court declared the recourse against the Court of Appeal decision inadmissible. The Supreme Court on 25 June 2010 opined that such a recourse would violate Article III of the New York Convention since it would impose a more onerous condition on the enforcement of Convention awards than on domestic (Dutch) awards. In the author's opinion, the Supreme Court's reasoning is at odds with both the New York Convention and Dutch arbitration law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
