Energy efficiency of hydrogen production during dark fermentation

Abstract

It is widely known that most of the world's energy is produced from non-renewable energy sources such as crude oil and coal. Hydrogen is an ideal fuel candidate with a high energy content and clean combustion product. Biohydrogen is an environmentally friendly, renewable biofuel with high energy density, making it a viable alternative to fossil fuels in the future. At the same time, despite the large number of articles on the intensification of both dark fermentation and anaerobic bioconversion in general, the operating costs of the proposed intensification methods are not well covered in the literature. The goal of the work was to estimate the conversion coefficient of thermal and electrical energy spent on the functioning of the process of dark fermentation of various organic wastes into the energy of produced hydrogen. A block diagram of the energy flows of the dark fermentation system and the structure of the energy consumption of the system were developed. The obtained literature and experimental data suggest that the conversion coefficient of energy into biohydrogen in the process of dark fermentation is less than 1, so to obtain 1 kWh of hydrogen it is necessary to expend more than 1 kWh of energy. At the same time, the use of a vortex layer apparatus for dark fermentation of the food waste model made it possible to increase the energy output of the process by more than 7 times, thereby bringing the values of the conversion coefficients of thermal and electrical energy closer to 1. Despite the fact that the energy efficiency of most known methods for producing hydrogen is higher than the energy efficiency of dark fermentation, it is worth noting that the raw material for producing hydrogen in the dark fermentation process is organic waste, and not high-energy fuel (natural gas, methane, coal) or water in the case of electrolysis. In addition, the use of a vortex layer apparatus for pre-treatment of the dark fermentation substrate made it possible to achieve electricity conversion coefficient values 40% higher than with water electrolysis.