Abstract

BackgroundEnergy cost of transport per unit distance (CoT) against speed shows U-shaped fashion in walking and linear fashion in running, indicating that there exists a specific walking speed minimizing the CoT, being defined as economical speed (ES). Another specific gait speed is the intersection speed between both fashions, being called energetically optimal transition speed (EOTS). We measured the ES, EOTS, and muscle activities during walking and running at the EOTS under hyperoxia (40% fraction of inspired oxygen) on the level and uphill gradients (+ 5%).MethodsOxygen consumption left(dot{V}{mathrm{O}}_2right) and carbon dioxide output left(dot{V}{mathrm{CO}}_2right) were measured to calculate the CoT values at eight walking speeds (2.4–7.3 km h−1) and four running speeds (7.3–9.4 km h− 1) in 17 young males. Electromyography was recorded from gastrocnemius medialis, gastrocnemius lateralis (GL), and tibialis anterior (TA) to evaluate muscle activities. Mean power frequency (MPF) was obtained to compare motor unit recruitment patterns between walking and running.Results dot{V}{mathrm{O}}_2 , dot{V}{mathrm{CO}}_2 , and CoT values were lower under hyperoxia than normoxia at faster walking speeds and any running speeds. A faster ES on the uphill gradient and slower EOTS on both gradients were observed under hyperoxia than normoxia. GL and TA activities became lower when switching from walking to running at the EOTS under both FiO2 conditions on both gradients, so did the MPF in the TA.ConclusionsES and EOTS were influenced by reduced metabolic demands induced by hyperoxia. GL and TA activities in association with a lower shift of motor unit recruitment patterns in the TA would be related to the gait selection when walking or running at the EOTS.Trial registrationUMIN000017690 (R000020501). Registered May 26, 2015, before the first trial.

Highlights

  • Energy cost of transport per unit distance (CoT) against speed shows U-shaped fashion in walking and linear fashion in running, indicating that there exists a specific walking speed minimizing the CoT, being defined as economical speed (ES)

  • CoT, ES, and energetically optimal transition speed (EOTS) During walking on the uphill gradient, the CoT values were significantly lower under hyperoxia than normoxia at faster gait speeds over 6.6 km h−1 (Fig. 1b)

  • A significantly faster ES was observed under hyperoxia (5.093 ± 0.297 km h−1) than normoxia (4.844 ± 0.279 km h−1) on the uphill gradient (Fig. 1d), while no significant difference was found between hyperoxia (5.011 ± 0.224 km h−1) and normoxia (5.001 ± 0.224 km h−1) on the level gradient (Fig. 1c)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Energy cost of transport per unit distance (CoT) against speed shows U-shaped fashion in walking and linear fashion in running, indicating that there exists a specific walking speed minimizing the CoT, being defined as economical speed (ES) Another specific gait speed is the intersection speed between both fashions, being called energetically optimal transition speed (EOTS). There is a U-shaped relationship between the energy cost of transport per unit distance (CoT; J kg−1 km−1) and gait speed (v; km h−1) during walking as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1. This means that there exists a specific walking speed. It is hypothesized that both ES and EOTS will be faster under hyperoxia than normoxia

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call