Abstract
Energy flows in perennial agro and natural ecosystems are essential and could be related to greenhouse gas emissions and increasing water demands. Energy indices and carbon and water footprint are useful tools in assessing the interaction between production systems and environmental impact inside Natura 2000 sites and enhancing ecosystem services. The main aims of this study were to determine and compare energy indices, carbon and water footprint of olive groves, orange and kiwi orchards, and grasslands within and between 2 years, located in a Natura 2000 site, using an adjusted life cycle assessment (LCA) method; and to illustrate the importance of farming systems to ecosystem services. Proportional stratified sampling was used to select 36 farm types (12 olive groves, 12 oranges, and 12 kiwi orchards) and 12 grasslands from the municipality of Amfilochia, western Greece, during 2018 and 2019. Descriptive data analysis, correlational analysis, ANOVA, and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were used to summarize and analyze the data. The main energy contributors for the three farm types were fertilizers and fuel consumption. The only input for the grasslands was animal manure. Energy efficiency showed the highest performance in olive groves followed in descending order by kiwi orchards, grasslands, and orange orchards. Concerning carbon-footprint, the values were the highest for orange orchards, followed in descending order by kiwi orchards, olive groves, and grasslands. Total water footprint values were the highest for grasslands and the lowest for olive groves. For both years, regarding HCA, each cluster consisted of the same ecosystems. According to the abovementioned indices, olive groves and grasslands are the most environmental friendly ecosystems. They could contribute in the environmental protection of the Amvrakikos Gulf, a Natura 2000 site. Kiwi orchards, although they are intensive along with the orange ones, seem to be more friendly to the environment than them and their cultivation in this Natura 2000 area is recommended. Energy indices and carbon and water footprint could be used, in order to highlight the related ecosystem (dis)services.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.