Abstract
Abstract The use of bio-energy crops for electricity production is considered an effective means to mitigate the greenhouse effect, mainly due to its ability to substitute fossil fuels. A whole range of crops qualify for bio-energy production and a rational choice is not readily made. This paper evaluates the energy and greenhouse gas balance of a mixed indigenous hardwood coppice as an extensive, low-input bio-energy crop. The impact on fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emission is calculated and discussed by comparing its life cycle (cultivation, processing and conversion into energy) with two conventional bio-energy crops (short rotation systems of willow and Miscanthus). For each life cycle process, the flows of fossil energy and greenhouse gas that are created for the production of one functional unit are calculated. The results show that low-input bio-energy crops use comparatively less fossil fuel and avoid more greenhouse gas emission per unit of produced energy than conventional bio-energy crops during the first 100 yr . Where the mixed coppice system avoids up till 0.13 t CO 2 eq./GJ, Miscanthus does not exceed 0.07 t CO 2 eq./GJ. After 100 yr their performances become comparable, amounting to 0.05 t CO 2 eq./ha/GJ. However, if the land surface itself is chosen as a functional unit, conventional crops perform better with respect to mitigating the greenhouse effect. Miscanthus avoids a maximum of 12.9 t CO 2 eq./ha/yr, while mixed coppice attains 9.5 t CO 2 eq./ha/yr at the most.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Bio-energy Crops
Conventional Crops
Greenhouse Gas Emission
Mixed Coppice
Greenhouse Gas
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
One Earth
Dec 1, 2019
GCB Bioenergy
Jul 1, 2012
iScience
Feb 1, 2022
Environmental Science & Technology
Aug 10, 2020
Social Science Research Network
May 9, 2020
Biomass and Bioenergy
Mar 1, 2012
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Oct 1, 2001
Environmental Research Letters
Mar 1, 2013
iScience
Feb 1, 2023
Journal of Cleaner Production
Sep 1, 2010
SSRN Electronic Journal
Jan 1, 2020
GCB Bioenergy
Aug 1, 2009
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Oct 15, 2009
Applied Energy
Jun 1, 2015
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Aug 1, 2005
Biomass and Bioenergy
Biomass and Bioenergy
Dec 1, 2023
Biomass and Bioenergy
Dec 1, 2023
Biomass and Bioenergy
Dec 1, 2023
Biomass and Bioenergy
Dec 1, 2023
Biomass and Bioenergy
Dec 1, 2023
Biomass and Bioenergy
Nov 1, 2023
Biomass and Bioenergy
Nov 1, 2023
Biomass and Bioenergy
Nov 1, 2023
Biomass and Bioenergy
Nov 1, 2023
Biomass and Bioenergy
Nov 1, 2023