Greenhouse gas and energy analysis of substitute natural gas from biomass for space heat
Greenhouse gas and energy analysis of substitute natural gas from biomass for space heat
48
- 10.6100/ir583729
- Nov 18, 2015
- Book Chapter
13
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-799968-5.00012-9
- Jan 1, 2015
- Assessing and Measuring Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Chapter 12 - Green supply chain toward sustainable industry development
- Book Chapter
- 10.1002/9781119118169.ch14
- Nov 25, 2015
Substitute Natural Gas ( <scp>SNG</scp> )
- Research Article
16
- 10.1016/j.spc.2023.07.031
- Aug 4, 2023
- Sustainable Production and Consumption
This study investigates the concept of “energy of scale“ in industrial energy systems, focusing on the reduction of specific energy consumption as production capacity increases. Using data from more than 25 000 industrial plants in Europe and the United States (U.S.), we develop fit functions for different industrial subsectors to validate the “energy of scale” effect. Our findings confirm that “energy of scale” exists in industrial energy systems and varies across subsectors. The effect is consistent between Europe and the U.S. We identify that energy-consuming units involved in value creation within production chains have the most significant influence on the scaling effect. This discovery has important implications for policy makers, facility managers, and energy researchers, providing new avenues for promoting energy efficiency and supporting the transition to cleaner energy sources.
- Research Article
40
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.092
- Apr 30, 2016
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Life cycle assessment of conventional and advanced two-stage energy-from-waste technologies for methane production
- Research Article
29
- 10.1111/jiec.12321
- Aug 18, 2015
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
SummaryEnvironmental impacts of the provision of wood energy have been analyzed through life cycle assessment (LCA) techniques for many years. Systems for the generation of heat, power, and combined heat and power (CHP) differ, and methodological choices for LCA can vary greatly, leading to inconsistent findings. We analyzed factors that promote these findings by conducting a systematic review and meta‐analysis of existing LCA studies for wood energy services. The systematic review investigated crucial methodological and systemic factors, such as system boundaries, allocation, transportation, and technologies, for transformation and conversion of North American and European LCA studies. Meta‐Analysis was performed on published results in the impact category global warming (GW). A total of 30 studies with 97 systems were incorporated. The studies exhibit great differences in their systemic and methodological choices, as well as their functional units, technologies, and resulting outcomes. A total of 44 systems for the generation of power, with a median impact on GW of 0.169 kilograms (kg) of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2‐eq) per kilowatt‐hour (kWhel), were identified. Results for the biomass fraction only show a median impact on GW of 0.098 kg CO2‐eq * kWhel−1. A total of 31 systems producing heat exhibited a median impact on GW of 0.040 kg CO2‐eq * kWhth−1. With a median impact on GW of 0.066 kg CO2‐eq * kWhel+th−1, CHP systems show the greatest variability among all analyzed wood energy services. To facilitate comparisons, we propose a methodological approach for the description of system boundaries, the basis for calculations, and reporting of findings.
- Research Article
24
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.093
- Aug 22, 2013
- Bioresource Technology
Life cycle assessment of mobility options using wood based fuels – Comparison of selected environmental effects and costs
- Book Chapter
6
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-815554-7.00011-8
- Jan 1, 2019
- Substitute Natural Gas from Waste
11 - Methane from waste: Thermal and biological technologies compared under a life cycle assessment perspective
- Research Article
30
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.090
- Sep 16, 2014
- Applied Energy
Local sharing of cogeneration energy through individually prioritized controls for increased on-site energy utilization
- Research Article
17
- 10.3390/catal13040771
- Apr 19, 2023
- Catalysts
Methane, the main component of natural gas, is one of the primary sources of energy extensively employed worldwide. However, the utilization of natural gas is limited by reserves and geographical availability. Thus, a thermochemical method of converting biomass to methane is appealing, especially gasification. Important factors affecting methane production are discussed in the review including operating parameters, catalysts of methanation and gas conditioning effects. Low temperature and high pressure are beneficial to promote methanation reaction. Ni-based catalysts are widely used as methanation catalysts, but suffer from deactivation problems due to carbon deposition, sintering and poisoning. The methods of gas conditioning include using water gas shift reaction and adding hydrogen from electrolysis. In addition, environmental and economic views are discussed. Other thermochemical process including hydrothermal gasification, fast pyrolysis and direct methanation at low temperature are also introduced briefly. Based on the above discussion, potential research directions for optimizing methane production are proposed.
- Research Article
46
- 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111147
- May 7, 2021
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review
- Research Article
70
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.038
- Feb 23, 2010
- Biomass and Bioenergy
Primary energy and greenhouse gas implications of increasing biomass production through forest fertilization
- Preprint Article
- 10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10136
- May 15, 2023
As part of the Net Zero Carbon Water Cycle Program (NZCWCP) for Victoria state in Australia, we have sought to understand the potential to reduce household energy consumption and related Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions by influencing water use. Digital metering data disaggregated into 57 million discrete water usage events across 105 households at a resolution of 10 millilitres at 10 second intervals from June 2017 to March 2020, from a previous Yarra Valley Water (Melbourne, Australia) study, was analysed, together with the dynamic relationship between the multiple energy sources (natural gas, grid electricity, solar) used to heat water for showers in each hour of the day. Water-related energy (WRE) use, including water desalination and treatment, pumping, heating, wastewater collection and treatment, comprised 12.6% of Australia&#8217;s primary energy use in 2019. Water heating (by natural gas and electricity) comprised the largest component of WRE use for across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. Furthermore, 69% of Victoria&#8217;s total water usage was by residential customers in 2020-2021. WRE GHG emissions were around 3.8% of Victoria&#8217;s total GHG emissions in 2018. Showers (~50% of residential WRE), system losses (~27% of residential WRE), and clothes washers (~9% of residential WRE) are the three largest components of WRE consumption. The main objective of this work is the creation of industry-accessible tools to improve knowledge and management options from the understanding of reductions in cost and GHG emissions from household showering WRE use. Potential options considered, to reduce water and energy use, as well as associated GHG emissions and customer utility bills, include (a) behaviour management such as water and energy pricing to change time of use behaviours, and (b) the adoption of efficient shower head improvements. Shower WRE and GHG emissions were found able to be strongly impacted by small changes in daily routines. GHG emissions reduction from showering could be reduced up to 20 (in summer) - 22% (in winter) by shifting demand time of showering or replacing residential showerheads. Extrapolated to state and Australian scales, reductions in water usage could be up to 14 GL (Victoria) and 144 GL (Australia), and reductions in GHG emissions 1,600 ktCO2eq (Victoria) and 17,300 ktCO2eq (Australia). It provides fundamental new information which could inform a suite of new management options to impact water-related energy from showers, and related GHG emissions and customer water and energy cost.
- Research Article
70
- 10.1016/j.joule.2020.08.001
- Aug 25, 2020
- Joule
Mitigating Curtailment and Carbon Emissions through Load Migration between Data Centers
- Conference Article
1
- 10.5339/qfarc.2016.eepp1669
- Jan 1, 2016
Energy-related activities are a major contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A growing body of knowledge clearly depicts the links between human activities and climate change. Over the last century the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil and other human activities has released carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and other heat-trapping GHG emissions into the atmosphere and thus increased the concentration of atmospheric CO2 emissions. The main human activities that emit CO2 emissions are (1) the combustion of fossil fuels to generate electricity, accounting for about 37% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 31% of total U.S. GHG emissions in 2013, (2) the combustion of fossil fuels such as gasoline and diesel to transport people and goods, accounting for about 31% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 26% of total U.S. GHG emissions in 2013, and (3) industrial processes such as the production and consumption of minerals and chemicals, accounting for about 15% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 12% of total ...
- Research Article
42
- 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110144
- Aug 7, 2020
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of palm fatty acid distillate derived renewable diesel
- Research Article
44
- 10.1007/s13399-013-0105-3
- Nov 21, 2013
- Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
Driven by the need to develop a wide variety of products with low environmental impact, biorefineries need to emerge as highly integrated facilities. This becomes effective when overall mass and energy integration through a centralised utility system design is undertaken. An approach combining process integration, energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission analyses is shown in this paper for Jatropha biorefinery design, primarily producing biodiesel using oil-based heterogeneously catalysed transesterification or green diesel using hydrotreatment. These processes are coupled with gasification of husk to produce syngas. Syngas is converted into end products, heat, power and methanol in the biodiesel case or hydrogen in the green diesel case. Anaerobic digestion of Jatropha by-products such as fruit shell, cake and/or glycerol has been considered to produce biogas for power generation. Combustion of fruit shell and cake is considered to provide heat. Heat recovery within biodiesel or green diesel production and the design of the utility (heat and power) system are also shown. The biorefinery systems wherein cake supplies heat for oil extraction and seed drying while fruit shells and glycerol provide power generation via anaerobic digestion into biogas achieve energy efficiency of 53 % in the biodiesel system and 57 % in the green diesel system. These values are based on high heating values (HHV) of Jatropha feedstocks, HHV of the corresponding products and excess power generated. Results showed that both systems exhibit an energy yield per unit of land of 83 GJ ha−1. The global warming potential from GHG emissions of the net energy produced (i.e. after covering energy requirements by the biorefinery systems) was 29 g CO2-eq MJ−1, before accounting credits from displacement of fossil-based energy by bioenergy exported from the biorefineries. Using a systematic integration approach for utilisation of whole Jatropha fruit, it is shown that global warming potential and fossil primary energy use can be reduced significantly if the integrated process schemes combined with optimised cultivation and process parameters are adopted in Jatropha-based biorefineries.
- Research Article
222
- 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.006
- Oct 7, 2008
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting
- Conference Article
- 10.1109/icmt.2011.6003230
- Jul 1, 2011
Housing sector is one of the important greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions which result global warming. In order to trace the energy use before and after primary energy factor of electricity adjustment, this paper analyzed the primary energy factor of electricity of the end user in Taiwan from 1982 to 2009 first. Then the compositions of the primary energy use and emissions in Taiwan housing sector were analyzed. The share of electricity use in total energy use of the housing sector was 64.2% at 2009 before primary energy factor of electricity adjustment. By using primary energy factor of the electricity demand of the year as adjustment, the share of the primary energy use of the electricity increased as 84.4%. Results of the research also showed that the annual log growth rate of the primary energy use induced by electricity use was 6.45% in Taiwan housing sector from 1982 to 2009. The total primary energy use of the housing sector in 2009 was about 5.7 times of which in 1982. Respect to emission factor of the housing sector, the research showed that the annual log growth rate of GHG Emissions of the housing sector was 7.81% from 1982 to 2009. The total GHG Emissions of the housing sector in 2009 was about 8.25 times of which in 1982. The shares of emissions from electricity in housing sector were 59.6% in 1982, and 86.6% in 2009. These results showed that the use of electricity was one of the major sources of the housing emissions growth this period.
- Research Article
94
- 10.4271/2009-01-1309
- Apr 20, 2009
- SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Researchers at Argonne National Laboratory expanded the Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation (GREET) model and incorporated the fuel economy and electricity use of alternative fuel/vehicle systems simulated by the Powertrain System Analysis Toolkit (PSAT) to conduct a well-to-wheels (WTW) analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). The WTW results were separately calculated for the blended charge-depleting (CD) and charge-sustaining (CS) modes of PHEV operation and then combined by using a weighting factor that represented the CD vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT) share. As indicated by PSAT simulations of the CD operation, grid electricity accounted for a share of the vehicle's total energy use, ranging from 6% for a PHEV 10 to 24% for a PHEV 40, based on CD VMT shares of 23% and 63%, respectively. In addition to the PHEV's fuel economy and type of on-board fuel, the marginal electricity generation mix used to charge the vehicle impacted the WTW results, especially GHG emissions. Three North American Electric Reliability Corporation regions (4, 6, and 13) were selected for this analysis, because they encompassed large metropolitan areas (Illinois, New York, and California, respectively) and provided a significant variation of marginal generation mixes. The WTW results were also reported for the U.S. generation mix and renewable electricity to examine cases of average and clean mixes, respectively. For an all-electric range (AER) between 10 mi and 40 mi, PHEVs that employed petroleum fuels (gasoline and diesel), a blend of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline (E85), and hydrogen were shown to offer a 40-60%, 70-90%, and more than 90% reduction in petroleum energy use and a 30-60%, 40-80%, and 10-100% reduction in GHG emissions, respectively, relative to an internal combustion engine vehicle that used gasoline. The spread of WTW GHG emissions among the different fuel production technologies and grid generation mixes was wider than the spread of petroleum energy use, mainly due to the diverse fuel production technologies and feedstock sources for the fuels considered in this analysis. The PHEVs offered reductions in petroleum energy use as compared with regular hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). More petroleum energy savings were realized as the AER increased, except when the marginal grid mix was dominated by oil-fired power generation. Similarly, more GHG emissions reductions were realized at higher AERs, except when the marginal grid generation mix was dominated by oil or coal. Electricity from renewable sources realized the largest reductions in petroleum energy use and GHG emissions for all PHEVs as the AER increased. The PHEVs that employ biomass-based fuels (e.g., biomass-E85 and -hydrogen) may not realize GHG emissions benefits over regular HEVs if the marginal generation mix is dominated by fossil sources. Uncertainties are associated with the adopted PHEV fuel consumption and marginal generation mix simulation results, which impact the WTW results and require further research. More disaggregate marginal generation data within control areas (where the actual dispatching occurs) and an improved dispatch modeling are needed to accurately assess the impact of PHEV electrification. The market penetration of the PHEVs, their total electric load, and their role as complements rather than replacements of regular HEVs are also uncertain. The effects of the number of daily charges, the time of charging, and the charging capacity have not been evaluated in this study. A more robust analysis of the VMT share of the CD operation is also needed.
- Research Article
51
- 10.1021/acs.est.9b06929
- Aug 10, 2020
- Environmental Science & Technology
Cropping system diversification can reduce the negative environmental impacts of agricultural production, including soil erosion and nutrient discharge. Less is known about how diversification affects energy use, climate change, and air quality, when considering farm operations and supply chain activities. We conducted a life cycle study using measurements from a nine-year Iowa field experiment to estimate fossil energy (FE) use, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, PM2.5-related emissions, human health impacts, and other agronomic and economic metrics of contrasting crop rotation systems and herbicide regimes. Rotation systems consisted of 2-year corn-soybean, 3-year corn-soybean-oat/clover, and 4-year corn-soybean-oat/alfalfa-alfalfa systems. Each was managed with conventional and low-herbicide treatments. FE consumption was 56% and 64% lower in the 3-year and 4-year rotations than in the 2-year rotation, and GHG emissions were 54% and 64% lower. Diversification reduced combined monetized damages from GHG and PM2.5-related emissions by 42% and 57%. Herbicide treatment had no significant impact on environmental outcomes, while corn and soybean yields and whole-rotation economic returns improved significantly under diversification. Results suggest that diversification via shifting from conventional corn-soybean rotations to longer rotations with small grain and forage crops substantially reduced FE use, GHG emissions, and air quality damages, without compromising economic or agronomic performance.
- Research Article
13
- 10.3390/pr10112299
- Nov 5, 2022
- Processes
Aluminum production is a major energy consumer and important source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. Estimation of the energy consumption and GHG emissions caused by aluminum production in China has attracted widespread attention because China produces more than half of the global aluminum. This paper conducted life cycle (LC) energy consumption and GHG emissions analysis of primary and recycled aluminum in China for the year 2020, considering the provincial differences on both the scale of self-generated electricity consumed in primary aluminum production and the generation source of grid electricity. Potentials for energy saving and GHG emissions reductions were also investigated. The results indicate that there are 157,207 MJ of primary fossil energy (PE) consumption and 15,947 kg CO2-eq of GHG emissions per ton of primary aluminum ingot production in China, with the LC GHG emissions as high as 1.5–3.5 times that of developed economies. The LC PE consumption and GHG emissions of recycled aluminum are very low, only 7.5% and 5.3% that of primary aluminum, respectively. Provincial-level results indicate that the LC PE and GHG emissions intensities of primary aluminum in the main production areas are generally higher while those of recycled aluminum are lower in the main production areas. LC PE consumption and GHG emissions can be significantly reduced by decreasing electricity consumption, self-generated electricity management, low-carbon grid electricity development, and industrial relocation. Based on this study, policy suggestions for China’s aluminum industry are proposed. Recycled aluminum industry development, restriction of self-generated electricity, low-carbon electricity utilization, and industrial relocation should be promoted as they are highly helpful for reducing the LC PE consumption and GHG emissions of the aluminum industry. In addition, it is recommended that the central government considers the differences among provinces when designing and implementing policies.
- Research Article
17
- 10.13182/nt06-a3756
- Aug 1, 2006
- Nuclear Technology
A fuel cycle model—called the Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation (GREET) model—has been developed to evaluate well-to-wheels (WTW) energy and emission impacts of motor vehicle technologies fueled with various transportation fuels. The GREET model contains various hydrogen (H2) production pathways for fuel cell vehicle (FCV) applications. In this study, the GREET model was expanded to include four nuclear H2 production pathways: (a) H2 production at refueling stations via electrolysis using light water reactor–generated electricity, (b) H2 production in central plants via thermochemical water cracking using heat from a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR), (c) H2 production in central plants via high-temperature electrolysis using HTGR-generated electricity and steam, and (d) H2 production at refueling stations via electrolysis using HTGR-generated electricity. The WTW analyses of these four options include these stages: uranium ore mining and milling, uranium yellowcake transportation, uranium conversion, uranium enrichment, uranium fuel fabrication, uranium fuel transportation, electricity or H2 production in nuclear power plants, H2 transportation, H2 compression, and H2 FCV operation. Our well-to-pump results show that significant reductions in fossil energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are achieved by nuclear-based H2 compared to natural gas–based H2 production via steam methane reforming for a unit of H2 delivered at refueling stations. When H2 is applied to FCVs, the WTW results also show large benefits in reducing fossil energy use and GHG emissions.
- Single Report
37
- 10.2172/1036090
- Dec 1, 2011
The pyrolysis of biomass can help produce liquid transportation fuels with properties similar to those of petroleum gasoline and diesel fuel. Argonne National Laboratory conducted a life-cycle (i.e., well-to-wheels [WTW]) analysis of various pyrolysis pathways by expanding and employing the Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model. The WTW energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the pyrolysis pathways were compared with those from the baseline petroleum gasoline and diesel pathways. Various pyrolysis pathway scenarios with a wide variety of possible hydrogen sources, liquid fuel yields, and co-product application and treatment methods were considered. At one extreme, when hydrogen is produced from natural gas and when bio-char is used for process energy needs, the pyrolysis-based liquid fuel yield is high (32% of the dry mass of biomass input). The reductions in WTW fossil energy use and GHG emissions relative to those that occur when baseline petroleum fuels are used, however, is modest, at 50% and 51%, respectively, on a per unit of fuel energy basis. At the other extreme, when hydrogen is produced internally via reforming of pyrolysis oil and when bio-char is sequestered in soil applications, the pyrolysis-based liquid fuel yield is low (15% of the dry mass of biomass input), but the reductions in WTW fossil energy use and GHG emissions are large, at 79% and 96%, respectively, relative to those that occur when baseline petroleum fuels are used. The petroleum energy use in all scenarios was restricted to biomass collection and transportation activities, which resulted in a reduction in WTW petroleum energy use of 92-95% relative to that found when baseline petroleum fuels are used. Internal hydrogen production (i.e., via reforming of pyrolysis oil) significantly reduces fossil fuel use and GHG emissions because the hydrogen from fuel gas or pyrolysis oil (renewable sources) displaces that from fossil fuel natural gas and the amount of fossil natural gas used for hydrogen production is reduced; however, internal hydrogen production also reduces the potential petroleum energy savings (per unit of biomass input basis) because the fuel yield declines dramatically. Typically, a process that has a greater liquid fuel yield results in larger petroleum savings per unit of biomass input but a smaller reduction in life-cycle GHG emissions. Sequestration of the large amount of bio-char co-product (e.g., in soil applications) provides a significant carbon dioxide credit, while electricity generation from bio-char combustion provides a large energy credit. The WTW energy and GHG emissions benefits observed when a pyrolysis oil refinery was integrated with a pyrolysis reactor were small when compared with those that occur when pyrolysis oil is distributed to a distant refinery, since the activities associated with transporting the oil between the pyrolysis reactors and refineries have a smaller energy and emissions footprint than do other activities in the pyrolysis pathway.
- Research Article
51
- 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.12.017
- Jan 4, 2019
- Energy and Buildings
Effect of different frame materials on the primary energy use of a multi storey residential building in a life cycle perspective
- Research Article
17
- 10.1002/bbb.1449
- Oct 10, 2013
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
Throughout the past two decades, numerous studies characterized the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and net energy balance of corn ethanol production in the USA. A wide range of reported values resulted from differences in the vintage of the data used to evaluate the ethanol conversion technology and the agricultural practices of corn production, which evolved substantially during the rapid growth phase of the industry. Methodological differences in life cycle assessments also caused the reported values to vary widely. With corn dry mills growing from 30% of total installed ethanol production capacity in 1990 to 80–90% from 2006 to 2011, we document the evolution of this industry using vintage‐specific data to analyze selected energy and environmental metrics, including GHG emissions, fossil energy use, direct land use, and GHG emissions reduction per hectare of land harvested for ethanol production. Our estimates indicate that production and use of corn ethanol emitted 44% fewer GHG emissions, consumed 54% less fossil energy and required 44% less land in 2010 compared to 1990 (on a life cycle basis). Our review and analysis point to strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of the corn dry mill industry by building on the progress already achieved. Using biomass (e.g. residues from corn production) for process heat or combined heat and power is one such strategy. Additional environmental benefits are projected from the adoption of integrated gasification combined cycle technology (using corn residues), which leads to energy‐self‐sufficient mills or net electricity producers depending on the power system configuration. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108149
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108210
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108165
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108249
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108237
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108192
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108201
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108184
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108166
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108195
- Nov 1, 2025
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.