Abstract

Background and Aim: After endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal neoplasms, some patients would have the diagnosis of submucosal (pT1b) cancers. How to manage these patients appropriately after the ESD has not been well elucidated. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes of the patients with pT1b esophageal cancers, with or without adjuvant therapy after the ESD. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. Between May 2013 and November 2017, 23 patients (25 lesions) undergoing ESD with the results of pT1b esophageal squamous cell carcinomas were enrolled in this study. After the ESD, our protocol was to give the patients adjuvant therapy (surgery or chemoradiotherapy) for the following criteria: positive vertical resection margins,lymphovascular (LV) invasion in the resected specimens, and SM2 cancers (tumor invasion to submucosa deeper than 200 μm). Those patients did not meet the criteria or refused adjuvant therapy were followed-up closely. Results: The mean patient age was 56.3 year (range, 45-75 year). The mean resected specimen length was 4.6 cm (range, 1.5-9.5 cm). The en block resection rate for the ESD was 100%. Four patients had positive vertical resection margins, resulting in an en blockplus R0 resection rate of 82.6% (19/23). Four other patients had LV invasion in the resected specimens. These eight patients (34.8%) were regarded as incomplete treatment by the ESD and seven of them received adjuvant therapy. None had tumor recurrence during the mean follow-up of 30.1 months. Two of the remaining 15 patients with R0 resection without LV invasion eceived adjuvant therapy based on the protocol. The other 13 patients received close observations only, including 11 patients with SM2 cancers. None had tumor recurrence during the mean follow-up of 23.6 months. Conclusions: ESD with/without adjuvant therapy based on the final pathological results may be an alternative treatment for patients with pT1b esophageal cancers.

Highlights

  • For superficial esophageal neoplasms (SENs), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is superior to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in terms of curative treatment [1,2,3]

  • Due to a substantial risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), radical esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy is still regarded as the standard treatment for SENs invading to the submucosa [5]

  • We conducted this study to report the outcomes of the patients with pT1b esophageal cancers, with or without adjuvant therapy after the ESD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For superficial esophageal neoplasms (SENs), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is superior to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in terms of curative treatment [1,2,3]. ESD is indicated for SENs confined to the mucosal layers (pT1a) [4]. It is inevitable that some patients with cT1aN0M0 SENs undergoing ESD would have pathologically upgraded pT1b cancers after the ESD. Patients with cT1bN0M0 SENs may receive ESD rather than surgery because of high surgical mortality and morbidity rates, and poor quality of life after the surgery [8,9]. Some of these patients may have pT1b cancers after the ESD. We conducted this study to report the outcomes of the patients with pT1b esophageal cancers, with or without adjuvant therapy after the ESD

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call