Endoscopic Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Graft Type

Abstract

The influence of graft type (nonautologous vs. autologous) on surgical outcomes in endoscopic anterior skull base (EASB) reconstruction is not well understood. This review systematically evaluated rates of postoperative complications of EASB repairs that utilized autologous or nonautologous grafts. Original studies reporting EASB reconstruction outcomes were extracted from PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to 2019. Risk ratios, risk differences, χ2 tests, and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate outcome measures: postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, meningitis, and other major complications (OMCs). A total of 2275 patients from 29 studies were analyzed. Rates of postoperative CSF leaks, meningitis, and OMCs were 4.0%, 1.6%, and 2.3%, respectively, using autologous grafts, and 5.0%, 0.3%, and 1.0%, respectively, using nonautologous grafts. Multivariate analysis of 118 patients demonstrated no significant differences in age, CSF flow rate, single or multilayer reconstruction, and presence of intraoperative CSF leak or lumbar drain. Meta-analyses of 6 studies yielded a risk ratio of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-2.14; P= 0.47) for postoperative CSF leakage, and risk differences of-0.01 (95% CI,-0.06 to 0.05; P= 0.80) and-0.02 (95% CI,-0.09 to 0.05; P=0.51) for postoperative meningitis and OMCs, respectively. There were no significant differences in postoperative CSF leakage (P= 0.95) and OMCs (P=0.41) between graft types among cases with intraoperative CSF leaks. However, meningitis rates were lower (P= 0.04) in the nonautologous group. EASB reconstructions utilizing autologous and nonautologous grafts are associated with similar rates of postoperative CSF leakage and OMCs. In cases with intraoperative CSF leakage, nonautologous grafts were associated with reduced postoperative meningitis.