Abstract
cardiomyocytes impairs cardiac relaxation and contractility. In animal models of HF, increasing SERCA2a expression by genetic enzyme replacement therapy improves cardiac function and survival. In patients, the phase 2a CUPID 1 trial reported that SERCA2a enzyme replacement with a novel recombinant adeno-associated viral vector containing human SERCA2a cDNA (AAV1/SERCA2a) promoted reverse left ventricular remodelling and improved symptoms, functionality and the clinical course. Purpose: CUPID 2 was a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized phase 2b trial in 250 patients designed to determine if a single intracoronary infusion of AAV1/SERCA2a, in addition to optimal HF therapy, reduced the rate of HF associated recurrent events (hospitalizations and ambulatory treatment) in patients with moderate to advanced systolic HF. Methods: Patients enrolled in CUPID 2 were between the ages of 18 and 80 years, had a diagnosis of NYHA class II-IV chronic HF of either ischemic or non-ischemic etiology and a left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of #35% and were at high risk for HF hospitalizations. Patients with circulating neutralizing AAV antibodies (O1.2) were excluded. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single intracoronary infusion of either AAV1/SERCA2a or placebo. The primary endpoint was time from treatment to HF-associated recurrent events in the modified intentto-treat population (n5243), defined as patients who received MYDICAR or placebo. Analysis was done using a semi-parametric joint frailty model to account for withinsubject correlated events and informative censoring from terminal events. The secondary efficacy endpoint was time to first terminal event (all-cause death, heart transplant, or LVAD implantation). The study had 80% power at the 0.05 two-sided significance level to detect a 45% recurrent event risk reduction. CUPID2 exceeded the pre-specified 186 adjudicated recurrent events by the time all patients had completed at least 12 months of follow-up (or had terminated early) post-randomization. Results: Treatment with MYDICAR did not result in an improvement in the primary endpoint of recurrent HF events compared to placebo (HR 5 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.65; p50.81). The MYDICAR to placebo comparison of the secondary endpoint of all-cause death, need for a mechanical circulatory support device, or heart transplant, likewise failed to show a significant treatment effect. No safety issues were noted. Conclusion: The results of CUPID 2 failed to support the hypothesis that AAV1/SERCA2a improves the clinical course of high risk HF patients with reduced EF.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have