Abstract

Physically-based radiative transfer models (RTMs) help understand the interactions of radiation with vegetation and atmosphere. However, advanced RTMs can be computationally burdensome, which makes them impractical in many real applications, especially when many state conditions and model couplings need to be studied. To overcome this problem, it is proposed to substitute RTMs through surrogate meta-models also named emulators. Emulators approximate the functioning of RTMs through statistical learning regression methods, and can open many new applications because of their computational efficiency and outstanding accuracy. Emulators allow fast global sensitivity analysis (GSA) studies on advanced, computationally expensive RTMs. As a proof-of-concept, three machine learning regression algorithms (MLRAs) were tested to function as emulators for the leaf RTM PROSPECT-4, the canopy RTM PROSAIL, and the computationally expensive atmospheric RTM MODTRAN5. Selected MLRAs were: kernel ridge regression (KRR), neural networks (NN) and Gaussian processes regression (GPR). For each RTM, 500 simulations were generated for training and validation. The majority of MLRAs were excellently validated to function as emulators with relative errors well below 0.2%. The emulators were then put into a GSA scheme and compared against GSA results as generated by original PROSPECT-4 and PROSAIL runs. NN and GPR emulators delivered identical GSA results, while processing speed compared to the original RTMs doubled for PROSPECT-4 and tripled for PROSAIL. Having the emulator-GSA concept successfully tested, for six MODTRAN5 atmospheric transfer functions (outputs), i.e., direct and diffuse at-surface solar irradiance ( E d i f , E d i r ), direct and diffuse upward transmittance ( T d i r , T d i f ), spherical albedo (S) and path radiance ( L 0 ), the most accurate MLRA’s were subsequently applied as emulator into the GSA scheme. The sensitivity analysis along the 400–2500 nm spectral range took no more than a few minutes on a contemporary computer—in comparison, the same analysis in the original MODTRAN5 would have taken over a month. Key atmospheric drivers were identified, which are on the one hand aerosol optical properties, i.e., aerosol optical thickness (AOT), Angstrom coefficient (AMS) and scattering asymmetry variable (G), mostly driving diffuse atmospheric components, E d i f and T d i f ; and those affected by atmospheric scattering, L 0 and S. On the other hand, as expected, AOT, AMS and columnar water vapor (CWV) in the absorption regions mostly drive E d i r and T d i r atmospheric functions. The presented emulation schemes showed very promising results in replacing costly RTMs, and we think they can contribute to the adoption of machine learning techniques in remote sensing and environmental applications.

Highlights

  • Since the advent of optical remote sensing, physically-based radiative transfer models (RTMs) have deeply helped in understanding the radiation processes occurring on the Earth’s surface and their interactions with vegetation and atmosphere (e.g., [1,2])

  • The normalized RMSE (NRMSE) indicates that relative errors fell well below 0.5%, but significant differences across the three machine learning regression algorithms (MLRAs) and RTMs can be observed

  • The excellent emulation-global sensitivity analysis (GSA) results as compared to the original RTM-GSA results for PROSPECT-4 and PROSPECT with SAIL (PROSAIL) suggest that emulators can open many practical applications

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the advent of optical remote sensing, physically-based radiative transfer models (RTMs) have deeply helped in understanding the radiation processes occurring on the Earth’s surface and their interactions with vegetation and atmosphere (e.g., [1,2]). RTMs are deterministic models that describe absorption and scattering, and some of them even describe the microwave region, thermal emission or sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence emitted by vegetation (e.g., [3,4]) They are useful in a wide range of applications including (i) sensitivity analysis; (ii) developing inversion models to accurately retrieve atmospheric and vegetation properties from remotely sensed data (see [5] for a review); and (iii) to generate artificial scenes as would be observed by an optical sensor (e.g., [6,7]). Plant and atmospheric RTMs are currently used in an end-to-end simulator that functions as a virtual laboratory in the development of next-generation optical missions [8,9] When it comes to vegetation analysis, RTMs have found a wide range of applications to model, study and understand light interception by plant canopies and the interpretation of vegetation reflectance in terms of biophysical characteristics [2,10,11]. Gradual improvement in RTMs accuracy, yet in complexity too, have diversified RTMs from simple turbid medium

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call